Humans have been battling the tropical disease malaria since at least the late fourth century B.C. This debilitating and deadly disease is actually a parasite which reproduces in humans and is spread through the saliva of mosquitoes when they suck blood from humans. While there is still no cure for malaria, there are three main strategies that we hope will lead to the eradication of this disease which kills nearly half a million people around the world each year.
The first strategy is to fight the malaria parasite itself by treating patients with powerful prescription medicines. Patients are tested to determine which strain of the malaria parasite is present, as different areas of the world have different strains of the parasite. Then, an effective medicine is administered to combat the symptoms of the infection.
The second strategy is to kill the mosquitoes that transfer the parasite to humans. Killing the adult mosquitoes using chemical sprays is a common option, but the larvae of the mosquitoes can also be killed where they develop, in pools of warm, still water. These larvae can be killed using chemicals, but another popular approach is to release fish into the water that prey on the larvae such as guppies to eat the larvae before they mature into adults.
The third strategy is called the sterile insect technique. "Sterile" means the insect cannot reproduce. This strategy involves breeding and hatching millions of mosquitoes, sterilizing the males with low-level gamma rays, and then releasing them into the wild population. Females that mate with the sterile males produce eggs which do not hatch, and this causes the mosquitoes to die out. This strategy has been effective in wiping out a number of insect pests including the screw-worm and several types o
The artcle introduces various ways to eradicate Malaria, a deadly disease spread through mosquitoes carrying the parasites. The author suggests three ways to eradicate the deadly disease. But the speaker holds strong opposition in the author's opnion and tries to shut down all the points made in the reading passage.
Firstly, the author explains strong medication can be given to treat various starins of the parasite after identifying the particular strain. But the lecturer finds flaws in the authors opinion and points out that there are no drugs to cure Malaria. He also says that they adapt and become immune to the drugs with which we treat them by giving examples of the medications like chloroquine and methyloquine which were very popular medicines against the disease long back and also says that now the parasite became immune to these drugs.
Secondly, the author states that killing mosquitoes using chemical sprays can stop the transfer of parasite to humans which stops the disease from spreading. The writer also states that the larvae of the mosquitoes also can be killed by spraying chemicals or releasing fishes like guppies into the water where larvae are developes. However, the speaker holds his firm by saying that there are a lot of mosquitoes and larvae out there, so there is no possibilty of eliminating all the insects.
Finally, the writer posits by stating that sterile insect technique can be used to wipe out the insects. According to this technique, male mosquitoes are sterilised with low-level gamma rays and then release them into the wild. When females mate with these males the eggs produced do not hatch. The speaker however doubts this technique. He says that the sterilised males have somehow lost the ability to properly mate with females. Therefore no eggs are poroduced to be hatched. He also says that the females mate with the other males and produce eggs.
To sum up, the author and the professor in the listening have conflicting views on eradicating Malaria. We can infer that it is hard to find a common ground for them
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-27 | Hibahtabbaa | 3 | view |
| 2023-03-27 | Hibahtabbaa | 3 | view |
| 2023-03-27 | Hibahtabbaa | 3 | view |
| 2023-03-01 | zaid | 71 | view |
| 2023-03-01 | zaid | 3 | view |
- TPO 05 Integrated Writing Task As early as the twelfth century A D the settlements of Chaco Canyon in New Mexico in the American Southwest were notable for their great houses massive stone buildings that contain hundreds of rooms and often stand th 80
- Rembrandts painting origin whether it is actually rembrandts or not 73
- Your city or province has received a large donation of money to improve the education of children It must choose between spending the money on improvement of early childhood education for children from ages 4 to 7 and spending the money on improvement of 73
- Directions Read the question below You have 30 minutes to plan write and revise your essay Typically an effective essay will contain a minimum of 300 words You can drag bottom right end of the column provided to have more space Do you agree or disagree wi 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement For students the ability to listen well is as important as the ability to read well is just as important as the ability to read well 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 179, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...in. But the lecturer finds flaws in the authors opinion and points out that there are n...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 229, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ys and then release them into the wild. When females mate with these males the eggs ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 434, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... ability to properly mate with females. Therefore no eggs are poroduced to be hatched. He...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 30.3222958057 155% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1737.0 1373.03311258 127% => OK
No of words: 346.0 270.72406181 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02023121387 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45818550965 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 145.348785872 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537572254335 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 540.9 419.366225166 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.7511624942 49.2860985944 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.5 110.228320801 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2222222222 21.698381199 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.38888888889 7.06452816374 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143352381934 0.272083759551 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0422649122147 0.0996497079465 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0536191482884 0.0662205650399 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.076377850025 0.162205337803 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0311979816395 0.0443174109184 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 63.6247240618 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 61.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.