incomes
The author of the reading claims imposing high taxes on cigarettes and unhealthy foods benefits everyone and provides three reasons to support. However, the lecturer refutes all the reasons made by the author and gives out three reasons why these are not true.
First of all, the author suggests that consumers of cigarettes and unhealthy foods by subjecting to high taxes, may buy fewer cigarets and this leads society to a healthier lifestyle. This statement is challenged by the lecturer. She holds an opposing view and points out that cunsumers of these stuffs in this situation are more likely to buy lower quality cigaretts with fewer price, so they will be in bigger problem than before.
Secondly, the writer contends that the equal rate of taxation for smokers and nonsmokers is not fair since smokers usually encounter with some sickness due to cigaretts and thetyproduce more burden for society. The lecture, however, rebuts this by mentioning that in this statement amount of incomes do not considered. Smokers who have lower income should pay the same rate of taxes that nonsmokers pay. Thus it is burden for smaller income.
Finally, it is stated in the article that higher tax rate on cigaretts and unhealthy foods raise government's revenue and this is good for all society. The lecturer, on the other hand, posits that government does not want to lose the revenue made by high taxes on theae stuffs and will remove some policies regarding nonsmoking public areas, so society will not benefits from it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 405, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...same rate of taxes that nonsmokers pay. Thus it is burden for smaller income. F...
^^^^
Line 13, column 362, Rule ID: DONT_NEEDS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'benefit'?
Suggestion: benefit
...oking public areas, so society will not benefits from it.
^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 362, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'benefit'
Suggestion: benefit
...oking public areas, so society will not benefits from it.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, thus, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1280.0 1373.03311258 93% => OK
No of words: 253.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05928853755 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46153365452 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561264822134 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 392.4 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.222607568 49.2860985944 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.363636364 110.228320801 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 21.698381199 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.90909090909 7.06452816374 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0753113838892 0.272083759551 28% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.035890720224 0.0996497079465 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0761529160819 0.0662205650399 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0413485989646 0.162205337803 25% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0716178742285 0.0443174109184 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.3589403974 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.