Integrated TPO 34
The article brings three reasons to prove the main cause of sea cow extinction in 1768. Nonetheless, the professor puts those theories under question. According to the professor, we do not know what exactly caused the extinction of this type of animal, which will be discussed in the following.
The first argument brought by the article is that Siberian people overhunted see cows because this animal is a good source of food in a harsh environment. This could be the main reason for their extinction. However, the lecturer asserts that sea cows are so massive, e.g. 10 tons, while the population of Siberian people was not that big. Therefore, Siberian people did not need to hunt sea cows too much and this reason brought for their extinction is not quite convincing.
Another theory raised by the article is that the ecosystem disturbance caused a decline in the type of plant called kelp, which is the main source of food for sea cows. As a result, this reduction in food supply caused their extinction. In contrast, the professor makes the point that when ecological changes happen, not only kelp but also other plants and marine animals would get affected, but the population of wales and other plants had not declined. Therefore, no food shortage occurred for sea cows.
The final contradiction between the article and the lecturer is whether European fur traders who came to Island for hunting are the cause of the extinction of sea cows. The article states that it is recorded that traders caught the last sea cow in 1768. On the contrary, the professor argues that fur traders could not be responsible for the disaster because the population of sea cows had declined about 100 years before they came to the Island. As such, the third reason is not acceptable either.
- Integrated TPO 44 70
- Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun to play games or sports. Others believe that it is best to use that time to do things together that are related to 66
- TPO-33 - Integrated Writing Task 70
- Integrated TPO 34 76
- Integrated TPO 42 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 62, Rule ID: THE_NN_AND_THE_NN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'are'?
Suggestion: are
...on between the article and the lecturer is whether European fur traders who came t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, e.g., first, however, nonetheless, so, therefore, third, while, in contrast, as a result, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.01324503311 299% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1485.0 1373.03311258 108% => OK
No of words: 304.0 270.72406181 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88486842105 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53469476368 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509868421053 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 442.8 419.366225166 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.2250454638 49.2860985944 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2666666667 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.73333333333 7.06452816374 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 4.33554083885 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.525933374994 0.272083759551 193% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.178750607952 0.0996497079465 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102254276282 0.0662205650399 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.312860563565 0.162205337803 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0673422540068 0.0443174109184 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.2367328918 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.