Integrated TPO 44
The article brought three reasons to prove that the silver coin, which has been discovered at a Native American site is a fake one. Nonetheless, the professor puts those reasons under question, which will be discussed in the following.
The first reason brought by the passage is that the coin has been found in far distances from the sites that Norse was settled. So the coin has no real connection with the settlements. However, the lecturer argues that there are many other objects, which has been discovered in the North America. In fact, there are some reasonable pieces of historical evidence that show Americans have traveled great distances. Therefore, they could reach Norse settlement and brought these objects to North America.
Another assumption raised by the article is that no other coins have been found at the Norse settlements. Hence, Norse did not bring silver coins to the North America. In contrast, the professor asserts that Norse did not have a permanent settlement. Therefore, they might pack up all the coins when they want to come back to Europe.
Third, contrary to the idea in the passage that North America did not value silver coins, the lecturer points out Europe has known that North America might value appealing objects like a silver coin and use it for making neckless. As such, Norse could take silver coins with themselves to the North America.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-08-07 | mojtaba_aam | 78 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, however, nonetheless, so, therefore, third, in contrast, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1162.0 1373.03311258 85% => OK
No of words: 232.0 270.72406181 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00862068966 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42595458491 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 145.348785872 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538793103448 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 350.1 419.366225166 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.4714314005 49.2860985944 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.3846153846 110.228320801 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8461538462 21.698381199 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06452816374 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.573695808745 0.272083759551 211% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.212751343614 0.0996497079465 213% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105064676585 0.0662205650399 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.34490697354 0.162205337803 213% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0977833606527 0.0443174109184 221% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.3589403974 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.42419426049 87% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 63.6247240618 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.