integrated writing
Tpo23, integrated
The author and the lecturer both deal with declining yellow cedar which is a species of tree that is common in northwestern North America. The author of the reading believes that population of yellow cedar has been declined more than a century now. However, finding all the ideas questionable, the lecturer repudiates the claims made in the article and asserts that the hypotheses referred to are not convincing, then presents some evidence to the contrary.
First of all, the author points out that decreasing yellow cedar may result of attacking insect parasites. Cedar bark beetle is one of the particular parasites which kill the tree.it is mentioned that beetles larvae eat wood; thus they lead to killing and declining yellow cedars. Conversely, this point is challenged by the lecturer. He says that cedars are resistant to parasites. In fact, their barks and leaves are powerful. Furthermore, he argues that healthy cedars do not influence by the insects. In other words, yellow cedars which are damaged and sick suffer from parasites insects.
Second, the author contends that bears cause to decrease yellow cedars. The article notes that bears which eat tree barks get their energy from the sugar of trees. If bears overuse sources sugar, yellow cedars become weaken. In contrast, the lecturer disputes this point and clarifies the fact that declining yellow cedars is not related to bears. He elaborates on this by mentioning that population of cedars are scattered in North main and islands and reducing population is seen in both of which although there are no bears in islands.
Finally, the author states that climate changes may cause shorten yellow cedars. The article establishes that the systems’ roots of trees have influenced and the time of growing roots have changed. As a matter of fact, roots start growing in the late winter when the temperature is low, so they destroyed. The lecturer, though, posits that many trees are vulnerable about the significant variation of climate. He puts forth the idea that elevation degrees of high and low temperatures can not lead to diminishing the yellow cedars population because other species have experienced similar conditions nevertheless they have survived.
- using vessels as electric batteries in ancient times 76
- remains of actual animal tissues in T.rex fossils 61
- using burning mirrors by ancient Greeks 60
- Children rely too much on the technology, like computers, smartphones, video games for fun and entertainment. Playing simpler toys or playing outside with friends would be better for children’ s development. 76
- integrated writing 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd sick suffer from parasites insects. Second, the author contends that bears c...
^^^
Line 6, column 46, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'decreasing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'cause' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: decreasing
...d, the author contends that bears cause to decrease yellow cedars. The article notes that b...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 531, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'cedars'' or 'cedar's'?
Suggestion: cedars'; cedar's
... can not lead to diminishing the yellow cedars population because other species have e...
^^^^^^
Line 8, column 640, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...itions nevertheless they have survived.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, so, then, thus, in contrast, in fact, as a matter of fact, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 12.0772626932 174% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1900.0 1373.03311258 138% => OK
No of words: 362.0 270.72406181 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24861878453 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.04702891845 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62208687511 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 145.348785872 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530386740331 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 574.2 419.366225166 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 13.0662251656 153% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.7245347973 49.2860985944 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.0 110.228320801 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1 21.698381199 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4 7.06452816374 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 4.45695364238 224% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0159061122216 0.272083759551 6% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00507642620192 0.0996497079465 5% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0221276288085 0.0662205650399 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.3589403974 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 63.6247240618 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.