Integrated writing TPO41Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge the specific arguments presented in the reading passage.

Essay topics:

Integrated writing TPO41

Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge the specific arguments presented in the reading passage.

According to the passage, it talks about that the new regulations of coal ash are not necessary. However, the lecturer thinks that there should be stricter regulations because current regulations are not sufficient. she refutes each argument in the passage and explains the reason.

First, the reading thinks that we already have effective regulations and states using liner is compulsory in every new disposal ponds and landfills as an example. but the lecturer explains that this rule only applies to new ponds and landfills which is not adequate and should include old disposal sites as well.

Second, the passage concerns that new rules might discourage recycling of coal ash and results in consumers stop buying coal ash recycled products. but the lecturer suggesting that it does not necessarily lead to purchase halt by customers. she gives Mercury as an example which government has imposed strict regulations on it, but people still bought the products.

Third, the passage states that strict new regulations will increase the cost for the power companies, which would not be accepted by the public. On the contrary, the lecturer suggests that these regulations completely worth the cost because it will protect public health. she also mentions that the customers’ billing will just increase one percent overall.

Votes
Average: 8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-12-10 Jeremy Yang 90 view
2022-07-24 Sizu 65 view
2022-07-24 Sizu 75 view
2022-07-24 Sizu 3 view
2022-06-24 Bvojkl 3 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 217, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...current regulations are not sufficient. she refutes each argument in the passage an...
^^^
Line 3, column 164, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
...osal ponds and landfills as an example. but the lecturer explains that this rule on...
^^^
Line 5, column 149, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
...stop buying coal ash recycled products. but the lecturer suggesting that it does no...
^^^
Line 5, column 242, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...ily lead to purchase halt by customers. she gives Mercury as an example which gover...
^^^
Line 7, column 273, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
... because it will protect public health. she also mentions that the customers' ...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, second, so, still, third, well, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 30.3222958057 43% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1126.0 1373.03311258 82% => OK
No of words: 210.0 270.72406181 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3619047619 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68194602241 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 145.348785872 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.580952380952 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 333.9 419.366225166 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.9930171131 49.2860985944 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 102.363636364 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0909090909 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.72727272727 7.06452816374 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.395463718364 0.272083759551 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136214897409 0.0996497079465 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12594715757 0.0662205650399 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221168603848 0.162205337803 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0519676778641 0.0443174109184 117% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.2367328918 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.