Jane Austin
The lecture and the reading both discuss the reliability of Jane Austen´s portrait. Whereas the lecture suggests three evidences that the girl depicted at the portrait is Jane Austin, the lecture challenges those points.
First, according to the reading, the Austen family recognized the picture as a portrait of the author and suggested that the girl was Jane Austen. However, the lecture refutes this point. The lecturer states that this fact was in 1880, 70 years after Jane Austin´s death. So, the family had never seen Jane Austin´s face by themselves.
Second, the reading claims that the girl in the portrait has some similar feature to Cassandra´s sketchs, which are pictures of Jane Austin as adult. Nevertheless, the professor argues that her had a large family, so the girl at the portrait may have been her relative.
Finally, the reading points out that the style of the painter was recognized as Austin family's painter. On the other hand, the professor says that this painter, called Humpherey, was an active painter in England when Jane Austin was 27 years old. Hence, the teenager of the portrait may not have been her.
In conclusion, the main points made in the reading to recognize Jane Austin as the girl depicted in the portrait, are effectively challenged by the lecturer.
- Internet 70
- technology has made children less creative than they were in the pass. 70
- children less creative than they were in the past because technology 78
- Reading only literature 80
- The government can take a variety of actions to help protect the environment. Whichone of the following do you think is the most important for the nation’s governmentto take to protect the environment.1. Fund the research to develop environmentally frie 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 159, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...effectively challenged by the lecturer.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, hence, however, may, nevertheless, second, so, whereas, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1111.0 1373.03311258 81% => OK
No of words: 216.0 270.72406181 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14351851852 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72161983131 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 145.348785872 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537037037037 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 329.4 419.366225166 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.2647030565 49.2860985944 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.5833333333 110.228320801 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 21.698381199 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.06452816374 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.382040549831 0.272083759551 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.165681065681 0.0996497079465 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117006879294 0.0662205650399 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.250618395573 0.162205337803 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0604010569817 0.0443174109184 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.