The reading passage discusses with us various ways in which team work in an organization is beneficial for the best outcomes. Advantages provided were that, as more people were involved there would be wider range of knowledge, expertise and skills. Responsibilities is distributed in a team and they share the success and failure equally. It concluded by claiming that team's work is far-reaching and have greater impact.
Where as, the audio clip discusses the cons of group work. Starting with the well known fact that not everyone in the group contributes equally. Thus, in many cases people who haven't contributed significantly towards the projects also take the merit when the project becomes successful. Next, it talked about the divergent ideas the group of people might have which would cost indecisiveness and take more time to move ahead in the project. Lastly, it discussed about how few people in the group might become influential over others and rest would just follow them. It stated that in such a scenario if the influential people said that the idea is creative the group goes ahead with it even if few people oppose it. When the project doesn't turn out as expected or fails the blame is to be shared by the whole group.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Whereas'?
Suggestion: Whereas
...far-reaching and have greater impact. Where as, the audio clip discusses the cons of g...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 177, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: haven't
...equally. Thus, in many cases people who havent contributed significantly towards the p...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 734, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... few people oppose it. When the project doesnt turn out as expected or fails the blame...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, lastly, so, thus, well, in many cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1029.0 1373.03311258 75% => OK
No of words: 210.0 270.72406181 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6371710604 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 145.348785872 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.62380952381 0.540411800872 115% => OK
syllable_count: 315.0 419.366225166 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 2.0 8.23620309051 24% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.5492305279 49.2860985944 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.5454545455 110.228320801 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0909090909 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.72727272727 7.06452816374 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 4.09492273731 49% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.336502278367 0.272083759551 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109966336976 0.0996497079465 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0427817507451 0.0662205650399 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236248389991 0.162205337803 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0333440469717 0.0443174109184 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.3589403974 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 63.6247240618 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.