We have all seen our elders motivating us to do better in school, but does that always guarantee a bright future? In my opinion, it is the ability to connect with people, understand their needs and relate to them which is far more important. I feel this way due to certain reasons that I will explore in my essays.
Primordially, being capable of relating with people improves the survival chance of any organization and thus your future would be secured. No matter how good the idea or innovation is, if people are unable to comprehend it, it will meet it's end soon. For instance let us say there are two hair oil companies who want to enter the market in a cold region like Chicago. One of the company spends it's resources for evaluating the market thoroughly, conducted various surveys and found out that a huge number of people suffer from dry scalp. This company then performed various experiments in it's laboratory and discovered a formula through which dry scalp would be lessened. While the other company didn't think much of the requirement and launched it's old line of products. It would be no wonder that the first company would see a huge success in that area while other would find it difficult to make the ends meet.
In conjunction with that, the more a company relate to people, the more is the demand for that company and it's product. There would undoubtedly be free publicity of the company as people could find it relatable to them. For instance in the example provided earlier, if people used the product of the first company and saw drastic improvement they would certainly recommend it to other people present in their social circle. Word of mouth is an asset for any company which could save a lot of finances and would be beneficial for an individual.
In contrast, I would agree that there might be a huge number of people holding an antithetical opinion than mine. Studying well in school and getting your basics clear help you anywhere you go. Right from being able to crack an interview to being able to successfully able to survive in the company studies from school helps a lot.
In winding up. I would state that there are more economical and personal benefit if you learn the life skill to relate to people. Even if you have studied hard and understood the concepts well, not applying it to areas that could be beneficial and relatable to people would lead to immense difficulties.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Television advertising directed toward young children aged two to five shouldn t be allowed 73
- Governments should place few if any restrictions on scientific research and development Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In develop 50
- The luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning f 50
- Endotherms are animals such as modern birds and mammals that keep their body temperatures constant For instance humans are endotherms and maintain an internal temperature of 37 C no matter whether the environment is warm or cold Because dinosaurs were rep 80
- Students should always question what they are taught instead of accepting it passively Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing an 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 698, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...ld be lessened. While the other company didnt think much of the requirement and launc...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, then, thus, well, while, for instance, i feel, in contrast, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2000.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 425.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70588235294 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54043259262 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51125521765 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541176470588 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 623.7 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.5881782415 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.0 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.65 5.45110844103 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241361634302 0.236089414692 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0695623165028 0.076458572812 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504500403035 0.0737576698707 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138456336505 0.150856017488 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0348973951674 0.0645574589148 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 10.9000537634 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.