The reading and lecture are both about if you could travel to Venus and stay there. The author of the reading believes that you could not stay there.The lecturer casts doubts made in the article. He thinks that you could live in Venus.
First of all, the author points out that you could not live on Venus, because of the atmospheric pressure. It is mentioned that the pressure would crush the station and possibly you. The point is challenged by the lecturer. He says that if the station was like a balloon, and stayed 50 km above the surface, the pressure would equal the amount in Earth.
Secondly, the author contends that there would not be water or oxygen in Venus. The article notes that Venus’ air is filled only with carbon dioxide and sulfuric acid. The lecturer rebuts this argument. He suggest that it is possible to make oxygen and water. He proves this by stating that you could make oxygen and water using the carbon dioxide, and sulfuric acid.
Finally, the author states that there would not be any light. The article establishes this by mentioning that the thick clouds would not let you use solar panels, thus making it so that machines are not usable. The lecturer, on the other hand, posits that usually, 50 km above surface would have thin clouds that show light. He also states that they could use the reflected lights to come to the solar panels and giving them light.
- Adapted from Dana Gioia Why Literature Matters 2005 by The New York Times Company Originally published April 10 2005 A strange thing has happened in the American arts during the past quarter century While income rose to unforeseen levels college attendanc 65
- TPO-01 - Integrated Writing Task In the United States, employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day. However, many employees want to work a four-day week and are willing to accept less pay inorder to do so. A mandatory policy requiri 60
- It is very important for students to learn as much as possible before their graduation from university For this reason many schools require students to attend all of their classes in person in order to achieve a passing score Do you agree or disagree with 80
- Schools should ask students to evaluate their teachers Do you agree or disagree Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 80
- TPO-02 - Integrated Writing Task In many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team. Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages. First of all, a group of people 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 150, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
... believes that you could not stay there.The lecturer casts doubts made in the artic...
^^^
Line 1, column 150, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... believes that you could not stay there.The lecturer casts doubts made in the artic...
^^^
Line 5, column 212, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'He' must be used with a third-person verb: 'suggests'.
Suggestion: suggests
.... The lecturer rebuts this argument. He suggest that it is possible to make oxygen and ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, second, secondly, so, thus, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 22.412803532 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1161.0 1373.03311258 85% => OK
No of words: 248.0 270.72406181 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.6814516129 5.08290768461 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.11953757129 2.5805825403 82% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.520161290323 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 348.3 419.366225166 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.6500741768 49.2860985944 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 72.5625 110.228320801 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5 21.698381199 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 7.06452816374 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139801118536 0.272083759551 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0531745242225 0.0996497079465 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0514164937694 0.0662205650399 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0838815935223 0.162205337803 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0310702857197 0.0443174109184 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.4 13.3589403974 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 53.8541721854 136% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 11.0289183223 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 12.2367328918 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.42419426049 90% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 63.6247240618 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.