The article states that maintaining humans on Venus planet would be impractical as well as impossible. It provides three reasons for this support. The professor of the lecture claims that it may be challenging to maintaining humans on Venus but not impossible. He also refutes all the reasons and gives alternative solutions by saying that making a station above 50km above could solve all challenges.
Firstly, the reading avers that the atmospheric pressure of Venus is too much higher than earth. Therefore, every spacecraft would be crushed because of the high pressure on the surface of the planet. On the contrary, the professor says that it will be not a problem if the human station will be above 50km. In the above, the pressure will be the same as the pressure of the earth. So, no spacecraft will be in danger of having any crushed.
Secondly, the author posits that the Venus atmosphere, consisted of various gas like sulfuric acid, carbon dioxide, nitrogen and there is no water and oxygen which are the most important things to human life. On the other hand, the lecture rebuts that by saying that some chemical processes can be run to obtain oxygen, hydrogen from carbon dioxide and sulfuric acid. After that, it can be preceded to make water from that. Hence, there will be no need to provide water and oxygen from earth.
Finally, the passage states that sunlight will not available to much to use solar machines and equipment. The reflection of thick clouds and dense layers of carbon dioxide will reduce the power of sunlight. But, the speaker also contends that by stating that the clouds will not be so much thick on the 50km top of the surface. And the station would be able to use the reflect sunlight as well as direct for solar machines and for other equipment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 62, Rule ID: TO_TOO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
...states that sunlight will not available to much to use solar machines and equipmen...
^^
Line 7, column 366, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...e. And the station would be able to use the reflect sunlight as well as direct for solar ma...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, hence, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, as well as, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 5.04856512141 317% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1486.0 1373.03311258 108% => OK
No of words: 310.0 270.72406181 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7935483871 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43056328393 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 145.348785872 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496774193548 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 458.1 419.366225166 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.2390420646 49.2860985944 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.4117647059 110.228320801 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2352941176 21.698381199 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.05882352941 7.06452816374 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245922850208 0.272083759551 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0879177990337 0.0996497079465 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0893241579262 0.0662205650399 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14958184636 0.162205337803 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0633298481821 0.0443174109184 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.3589403974 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.2367328918 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.