Methods to prevent birds from getting injured.
The reading and the lecture are about preventing the birds from getting injured through the glass doors or windows. The author of the reding feels that injury to birds can be prevented by making one-way see-through glass, colorful designs on glass, and by creating a magnetic field. The lecturer challenges the claims made by the author and he feels that none of these ideas can prevent from injuring birds and can be explored below.
First of all, the author of reading suggests that by tinting the glass on one side can make birds think of a barrier, they cannot see through and will not try to fly through it. How ever, the professor refutes this by saying that, the reflection seen on tinted mirrors can be of the sky or a tree, this makes birds fly through it. Moreover, the birds cannot understand the reflection made by the mirrors and will end up injuring themselves.
Next, the article mentions that painting colorful pictures or any designs like stripes over the glass makes the bird flying away from the glass, and also people can see out through those unpainted areas. This specific argument is challenged by the lecturer. He claims that paintings or stripes made by architects can make the birds assume that there are holes in between the paintings and will fly through it. Additionally, he says the painting will make the room darker for the people inside the building.
Finally, the author posits that creating a magnetic field will help the birds to navigate in the right direction when they fly. On the other hand, the tutor position is that the birds use this magnetic field when they fly for longer distances. For instance, when they try to travel from a colder country to warmer countries during winters. He also adds that shorter distance wouldn't affect the birds from deviating through magnetic fields, such as traveling from one side of the city to other side. In addition, he mentions that brightness will help the birds when they travel shorter distances. This clearly shows that birds can injure even after installing a magnetic field in the building.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-26 | woung717 | 68 | view |
| 2021-11-26 | predatoros | 81 | view |
| 2021-10-08 | devvratjoshi | 78 | view |
| 2021-10-08 | devvratjoshi | 78 | view |
| 2021-10-07 | devvratjoshi | 78 | view |
- dinosaurs are endotherms 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to work as a team than as an individual to succeed Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- lines found on the dinosaurs fossils are not feathers remanants 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Living today is more comfortable and easier than when your grandparents were children Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Leadership comes naturally one cannot learn to be a leader Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 284, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...lass, and by creating a magnetic field. The lecturer challenges the claims made by ...
^^^
Line 3, column 179, Rule ID: HOW_EVER[1]
Message: Did you mean 'however'?
Suggestion: However
...ugh and will not try to fly through it. How ever, the professor refutes this by saying t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 376, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...ers. He also adds that shorter distance wouldnt affect the birds from deviating through...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, if, moreover, so, for instance, in addition, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 5.04856512141 317% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 22.412803532 147% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 30.3222958057 175% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1730.0 1373.03311258 126% => OK
No of words: 357.0 270.72406181 132% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84593837535 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32175545142 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 145.348785872 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.467787114846 0.540411800872 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 494.1 419.366225166 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4478282915 49.2860985944 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.125 110.228320801 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3125 21.698381199 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6875 7.06452816374 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258146810022 0.272083759551 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10250118556 0.0996497079465 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103248101162 0.0662205650399 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16891928757 0.162205337803 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105109638622 0.0443174109184 237% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 53.8541721854 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.7273730684 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.