methods for preventing frogs from extinction

Essay topics:

methods for preventing frogs from extinction

The discussed issue is about inhibiting frog species from extinction. Several methods have been proposed to account how we can prevent the reduction of frog population. however, the professor questioned these methods.

First, a chemical substance which is using by farmers in order to eliminate insects from farm crops is detriminal for frogs. It is assumed that, this chemical material has entered to the habitate of the frogs and it has killed considerable numbers of frogs and researchers have proposed that a law should be presented in order to prevent the farmers from using this substance. However, this action is not economicaly practicable. In fact, there is a competition between farmers fro selling their products in the markets and this action will reduce the quality of crops which farmers are going to sell in the market. Thus, preventing farmers from using Pesticides for eradocating insects from farmland may have sever disadvantageuos.

Further, one reason associated with the reduction of frogs is the distribution of Fungus. This phenomenon has made the frogs body vulnarable to the enviroment by thicking their skins and it maks frogs dying from lack of hydration absorbed by their skins. In addition, researchers have proposed a treatment for frogs in order to make their body more stroge against this infection. However, this method is not useful for several reasons. primarly, this treatment should be applied to each frog indevidually and this action is accossiated with capturing and applying treatment to the frogs which is not feasible. Besides, this treatment should be applied to new generations as well constantly which will makes the process implausible.

Finaly, although the natural habitates of the frogs is indanger and human's activities are contributed to this fact, we cannot prevent people from using water supplies and other sources which we need for our activities. On the other hand, there is a more significant problem that we should consider instead of water such as global warming. In fact, global warming has evaporated most of the water of many places and the problem of lack of water has emerged because of global warming. Hence, preventing people' activity is unlikely to do with solving frog's problem.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-12-27 parisma 73 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 170, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...event the reduction of frog population. however, the professor questioned these methods...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 479, Rule ID: FOR_FRO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'for'?
Suggestion: for
... there is a competition between farmers fro selling their products in the markets a...
^^^
Line 9, column 437, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Primarly
...thod is not useful for several reasons. primarly, this treatment should be applied to ea...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, hence, however, if, may, so, thus, well, in addition, in fact, such as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.4613686534 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 30.3222958057 168% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 5.01324503311 319% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1906.0 1373.03311258 139% => OK
No of words: 361.0 270.72406181 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27977839335 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.04702891845 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77017728372 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 145.348785872 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498614958449 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 575.1 419.366225166 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.6861797692 49.2860985944 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.888888889 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0555555556 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11111111111 7.06452816374 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317233702201 0.272083759551 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105301774785 0.0996497079465 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0849970906096 0.0662205650399 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203388275433 0.162205337803 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0379489388859 0.0443174109184 86% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.3589403974 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 63.6247240618 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.

Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.