Pablo alto building usage theories
Different theories were proposed by writer on building usage and the speaker is contradicting the points with regards to three points made in passage as living place, storage facility and thirdly ceremonial place by giving points and evidences that prove otherwise.
Firstly he points out that as per passage chaows were residential places because their outer structure matches to apartments of America. However according to speaker , is misconception. In reality from indide Chaws don’t look like living places. For hundreds of people living in that apartment there should be lots of fire places to cook food. Only 10 fire places were found in the chaows.
Secondly, he opposes the information given in passage regarding storage for maize crop and rooms were suitable for storage as well. he clarifies that in practice no traces of container and maize crop were found. rooms were large and empty not useful for storage.
thirdly he denies validity of another point that was averred in the passage related to Pablo Alto was used as ceremonial place. As per auther pile of broken pots suggested that after ceremony people discarded and buried plates. speaker contradicts that It is possible that location of burried plate was used to discard all constuction waste generated during construction. Furthermore, he suggests that plates might be used by the workers and was discarded by them after use.
Hence in conclusion, the speaker denied all three theories of usage of the big building having hundreds of room capable of keeping hundreds of people inside as well as he lucidly substantiates his point of view with cogency.
- TPO-41 - Independent Writing TaskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- 4days workweek 71
- Some people believe that the Earth is being harmed by human activity Others feel that human activity makes the Earth a better place to live What is your opinion 83
- Sales principle 93
- In many countries the proportion of old people is steadily increasing. Some think this good, while other believe this a problem for a country. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 166, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...of America. However according to speaker , is misconception. In reality from indid...
^^
Line 9, column 133, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...ooms were suitable for storage as well. he clarifies that in practice no traces of...
^^
Line 9, column 213, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Rooms
...of container and maize crop were found. rooms were large and empty not useful for sto...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Thirdly
... and empty not useful for storage. thirdly he denies validity of another point tha...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 229, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Speaker
...ony people discarded and buried plates. speaker contradicts that It is possible that lo...
^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...d was discarded by them after use. Hence in conclusion, the speaker denied all t...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, look, regarding, second, secondly, third, thirdly, well, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 30.3222958057 139% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1383.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 264.0 270.72406181 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23863636364 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62185138091 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 145.348785872 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 427.5 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 8.23620309051 12% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 62.2586769627 49.2860985944 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.7857142857 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8571428571 21.698381199 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.35714285714 7.06452816374 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118676502619 0.272083759551 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0296205667732 0.0996497079465 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.057036570288 0.0662205650399 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0687994385915 0.162205337803 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0660792117699 0.0443174109184 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.3589403974 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.