The passage and lecture are about ligalizing of marejuana in USA, the reading passage elaborates to three reasons to explain that marejuana should no longer be criminal offense in USA. The lecture casts doubt on claim made in article. She believes, this issue about legilaty of marijuana is ugly head.
First, the author mentions, the fedral government will get benefit by taking taxes by selling marijuana like taxes which are taking fome cigaretts and alcohol. This point challenge by lecturer, She states that, 40$ to 100$ billion taxes forom buying marijuana is too bigs, therefore it is incorrect information, moreover, to increase taxes, the government have to rise the amount of taxes on gasoline instead of marijuana.
Second, the writer urges, once marijuana is legalize, the crime will decrease, since marijuana related- crimes reduce, state and national police will focus on other crimes, it isc called (war 0n drug). This argument rebutts by professor. She illustrates to, this can just will not happen, because this will lead to increase marijuana indiutries, and increase it is production, as a reasult, the rate of crimes will drasticaly elevated.
Finally, the auther believes that every one has right to smoke marijuana like his right by smoke cigarettes and drinking alcohol, The professor in the other hand states, in this country therte are many addictor people how may drink alcohol or tobacco, therefore we can not drop gasoline on fire, that is why this is not suitible right, furthermore dringing marijuana never be a pursut of happiness.
The passage and lecture are about ligalizing of marejuana in USA, the reading passage elaborates to three reasons to explain that marejuana should no longer be criminal offense in USA. The lecture casts doubt on claim made in article. She believes, this issue about legilaty of marijuana is ugly head.
First, the author mentions, the fedral government will get benefit by taking taxes by selling marijuana like taxes which are taking fome cigaretts and alcohol. This point challenge by lecturer, She states that, 40$ to 100$ billion taxes forom buying marijuana is too bigs, therefore it is incorrect information, moreover, to increase taxes, the government have to rise the amount of taxes on gasoline instead of marijuana.
Second, the writer urges, once marijuana is legalize, the crime will decrease, since marijuana related- crimes reduce, state and national police will focus on other crimes, it isc called (war 0n drug). This argument rebutts by professor. She illustrates to, this can just will not happen, because this will lead to increase marijuana indiutries, and increase it is production, as a reasult, the rate of crimes will drasticaly elevated.
Finally, the auther believes that every one has right to smoke marijuana like his right by smoke cigarettes and drinking alcohol, The professor in the other hand states, in this country therte are many addictor people how may drink alcohol or tobacco, therefore we can not drop gasoline on fire, that is why this is not suitible right, furthermore dringing marijuana never be a pursut of happiness.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-13 | talelaldabous | 76 | view |
- The passage and lecture are both talking about United Kingdom artifacts The writer states three reasons which participate in limitation of these artifacts The lecturer in the other hand casts doubt on claim made in article She mentions Non of these reason 63
- Today with a huge advancement in technology in all aspect of life people demand on internet is increase The question is whether government should fund to improve internet access or public transportation This can be weighed in many aspects Admittedly some 70
- The passage and lecture talk about ways to protect Torreya taxifoha which are trees very common in Florida The writer claims three ways to save these plant The leturer casts doubt on claim mde in the article She mentions all ways are not practical Ans she 60
- The reading amd lecture talk about thoeries which mayb lead to extinction of some living organism in the Triassic period The author believes that this extiniction explained by three theories The lecturer cases doubts on claim which is made by author she d 60
- The passage and lecture about the ability of humpback whales to migrate using staes for navigation The author claims that humpblack whales capable of use stars to migrate longe distance He gives evidences to support this idea The lecturer casts doubt on c 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The passage and lecture are about ligali...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 212, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$40'.
Suggestion: $40
...challenge by lecturer, She states that, 40$ to 100$ billion taxes forom buying mari...
^^^
Line 2, column 219, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$100'.
Suggestion: $100
...ge by lecturer, She states that, 40$ to 100$ billion taxes forom buying marijuana is...
^^^^
Line 2, column 412, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e amount of taxes on gasoline instead of marijuana. Second, the writer urges, ...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...xes on gasoline instead of marijuana. Second, the writer urges, once marijuana...
^^
Line 3, column 47, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'legalized'.
Suggestion: legalized
...nd, the writer urges, once marijuana is legalize, the crime will decrease, since marijua...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...te of crimes will drasticaly elevated. Finally, the auther believes that every ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, may, moreover, second, so, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1311.0 1373.03311258 95% => OK
No of words: 253.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18181818182 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59192718244 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 145.348785872 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632411067194 0.540411800872 117% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 3.25607064018 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 21.2450331126 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 108.606095366 49.2860985944 220% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 145.666666667 110.228320801 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1111111111 21.698381199 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.77777777778 7.06452816374 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283450295181 0.272083759551 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148893210797 0.0996497079465 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.235585902757 0.0662205650399 356% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229874185043 0.162205337803 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.341327600785 0.0443174109184 770% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.3589403974 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 53.8541721854 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.0289183223 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.42419426049 113% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 63.6247240618 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.498013245 126% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.