The passage and lecture are both talking about the affect of buzzers on people. The writer claims, buzzers have hurmful impact on consumers. The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article. He stats, the negative impact of buzzers are misleading.
First, the auther states, buzzers do not tell the truth about prodects. They give incorrect information about products. The lecturer refutes this notion. He sayshoe buzzers do not say the truth, if they do so, the companies will never hire them. Moreover, the companies used people who already used prodect like phone and they saw its a good prodects.
Second, the writer mentions, buzzers are paid for advertising, and the truth should be from people how are not motive for misleading. This statement is chalenged by professor. He asserts, all people talk about many prodect. its effectiveness and properties. Furthermore, buzzers talk about what their truth experience with products that they bought. Buzzers never gave wrong information to customers.
Finally, the author points to destroyed civilization as a result of bad impacts of buzzings likely to have on social relationship between people. The lecturer in the other hand contradicts this point. He claims, When buzzing are bad, the buzzers with not buy or use it. But according to phone that buzzer talk about in bussieness class and how it has a many advantages. Then customers will convict with this product.
The passage and lecture are both talking about the affect of buzzers on people. The writer claims, buzzers have hurmful impact on consumers. The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article. He stats, the negative impact of buzzers are misleading.
First, the auther states, buzzers do not tell the truth about prodects. They give incorrect information about prodects. The lecturer refutes this notion. He sayshoe buzzers do not say the truth, if they do so, the companies will never hire them. Moreover, the companies used people who already used prodect like phone and they saw its a good prodects.
Second, the writer mentions, buzzers are paid for advertising, and the truth should be from people how are not motive for misleading. This statement is chalenged by professor. He asserts, all people talk about many prodect. its effectiveness and properties. Furthermore, buzzers talk about what their truth experience with products that they bought. Buzzers never gave wrong information to customers.
Finally, the author poists to destroyef civilization as a result of bad impacts of buzzingis likely to haveon social relationship between people. The lecturer in the other hand contradictes this point. He claims, When buzzing are bad, the buzzers with not buy or use it. But according to phone that buzzer talk about in bussieness class and how it has a many advantiges. Then custemores will convict with this prodect.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-04 | talelaldabous | 76 | view |
- The passage and lecture are both disccusing the surprising behaviors of elephant The writer of the passage claims that elephant has several surprtising behaviors The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article She mention that these elephant behavioes a 76
- As a result of increase in pouplulation and number of cars in recenr decade since we can obviously notice a busy city streets whether drivers should pay a fee in crowded roads or not can be weighed in many aspects In my opinion I do not concur with taking 76
- Every person in this world has a lot of tasks to do daily job and take cares of his family this will get him strees This is due to complex life that we face now a days whether because of people busy doing many things they do very few things well or not Th 60
- The reading passage and lecture about buzzing which is a type of advertising of priducts Writer of the passage points that buzzing shuold be banned The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article He says critics about buzzing are missleading First Autho 83
- The reading passage and lecture are both disccusing how humpback whales navigate during migration The author claims three evidences that humpback used stars for navigation The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in the article He mentions non of these evid 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The passage and lecture are both talking...
^^^
Line 1, column 145, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...zzers have hurmful impact on consumers. The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in a...
^^^
Line 2, column 318, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ople who already used prodect like phone and they saw its a good prodects. Sec...
^^
Line 2, column 333, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...y used prodect like phone and they saw its a good prodects. Second, the writer ...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...one and they saw its a good prodects. Second, the writer mentions, buzzers are...
^^
Line 3, column 226, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Its
...ts, all people talk about many prodect. its effectiveness and properties. Furthermo...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r gave wrong information to customers. Finally, the author poists to destroyef ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, if, moreover, second, so, then, talking about, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 12.0772626932 33% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1197.0 1373.03311258 87% => OK
No of words: 230.0 270.72406181 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20434782609 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66514646334 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 145.348785872 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 352.8 419.366225166 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 13.0662251656 153% => OK
Sentence length: 11.0 21.2450331126 52% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.9724070747 49.2860985944 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 59.85 110.228320801 54% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 11.5 21.698381199 53% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 4.6 7.06452816374 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.431834952115 0.272083759551 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129817533796 0.0996497079465 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118033498673 0.0662205650399 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.302519004715 0.162205337803 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.234529061478 0.0443174109184 529% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 13.3589403974 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.77 53.8541721854 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 11.0289183223 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 11.7 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 4.5 10.7273730684 42% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.4 10.498013245 61% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.