Passage:Altruism is a type of behavior in which an animal sacrifices its own interest for that of another animal or group of animals. Altruism is the opposite of selfishness; individuals performing altruistic acts gain nothing for themselves.Examples of a

The passage talks about the altruism which is defined as the sacrifices that an individual makes for another or the group as whole. This behavior is displayed by both humans and animals.

The reading passage talks about the example of marketeer which stands as guard when rest of the marketeers are searching for food. It claims that the marketeer here displays the behavior of altruism, as the guarding marketeer has a higher chance of being killed by the predator. The professor refutes this claim by stating the guarding marketeer has a higher chance of survival as it first sees the predator as is the first to escape. He also adds that guarding marketeer call put the other marketeer at risk instead of itself.

Secondly the passage talks about the guarding marketeer stays on an empty stomach so that the other marketeer can eat. The professor disagrees this by mentioning that the guarding marketeer is already full stomach before it begins guarding. Thus the professor says that this is not the behavior of altruism.

Meanwhile in the human context the passage talks about the donation of kidney or organs as an act of altruism. But the professors differs with this. He says that although the donor is saving a life, in turn he receives appreciation of the donor and the society as well. Therefore the professor does not consider this as an behavior of altruism.

Votes
Average: 7.1 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 346, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... claim by stating the guarding marketeer has a higher chance of survival as it fi...
^^
Line 3, column 502, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g marketeer call put the other marketeer at risk instead of itself. Secondly ...
^^
Line 5, column 110, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mpty stomach so that the other marketeer can eat. The professor disagrees this by...
^^
Line 5, column 243, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...full stomach before it begins guarding. Thus the professor says that this is not the...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
...is is not the behavior of altruism. Meanwhile in the human context the passage talks ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 271, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...n of the donor and the society as well. Therefore the professor does not consider this as...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 321, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...the professor does not consider this as an behavior of altruism.
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1146.0 1373.03311258 83% => OK
No of words: 234.0 270.72406181 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89743589744 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53054970082 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 145.348785872 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.495726495726 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 341.1 419.366225166 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.3174948685 49.2860985944 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.1538461538 110.228320801 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 21.698381199 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.53846153846 7.06452816374 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134319529155 0.272083759551 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0615263840527 0.0996497079465 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0746545958678 0.0662205650399 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11532625229 0.162205337803 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0984389355544 0.0443174109184 222% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.3589403974 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.84 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 63.6247240618 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.