In the past century, the steady growth of the human population and the corresponding increase in agriculture and pesticide use have caused much harm to wildlife in the United States—birds in particular. Unfortunately for birds, these trends are likely to continue, with the result that the number of birds in the United States will necessarily decline.
First, as human populations and settlements continue to expand, birds' natural habitats will continue to disappear. Forests, wetlands, and grasslands will give way to ever more homes, malls, and offices. As the traditional areas suitable for birds keep decreasing, so will the size of the bird populations that depend on those vanishing habitats.
Second, agricultural activities must increase to keep pace with the growing human population. The growth of agriculture will also result in the further destruction of bird habitats as more and more wilderness areas are converted to agricultural use. As a result, bird populations in rural areas will continue to decline.
Third, as human settlements expand and agriculture increases, the use of chemical pesticides will also increase. Pesticides are poisons designed to kill agricultural and home garden pests, such as insects, but inevitably, pesticides get into the water and into the food chain for birds where they can harm birds. Birds that eat the poisoned insects or drink contaminated water can die as a result, and even if pesticides do not kill birds outright, they can prevent them from reproducing successfully. So pesticides have significantly contributed to declines in bird population, and because there will continue to be a need to control agricultural pests in the future, this decline will continue.
The reading and the lecturer are both talk about the possibility of a reduction of the bird population in the us. Whereas, the author of the reading states that, the growth of humans and the practice of increasing agricultural areas and fertilizers might cause the reduction of the bird population, the lecturer suggests that this may not as badly infected as the author predicts. she casts doubts on the mani three points made by the reading providing three reasons.
First of all, according to the reading, the expansion of the human population will continue to replace the habitant areas of the birds and thus those populations tend to vanish. However, the lecturer disputes this point. she says that the increase of urbanization is not necessarily to cause to reduce the bird populations. further , he mentions that the number of different bird species is now increasing in the urban areas that were previously unpleasant.
Secondly, the author states that the expansion of further agriculture will cover the bird habitant place to fields and thus reducing their population. Nevertheless, the lecturer refutes this argument. she argues that by implication of the new technology people now need less land to grow a huge amount of food. she also adds that the productivity and variety of food are also increased by the application of new technology.
Finally, the reading claims that the use of poisonous pesticides and for this the reduction of insects which are the main food of many birds species are reduced. Moreover, the birds are being more vulnerable by eating those poisonous insects. On the other hand, the lecturer believes that new pest control pesticides are less toxic and the introduction of the new agricultural species which are more resistive to the pest are surely not effected the bird populations.
In conclusion, although the reading and the lecturer both talk about the bird population they both are clearly different opinions to the point.
- sub 3
- Governments should invest as much in the arts as they do in the military.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and suppor 50
- bees 75
- astro 3
- Ethanol fuel, made from plants such as corn and sugar cane, has been advocated by some people as an alternative to gasoline in the United States. However, many critics argue that ethanol is not a good replacement for gasoline for several reasons.First, th 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 382, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
... badly infected as the author predicts. she casts doubts on the mani three points m...
^^^
Line 7, column 222, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...ever, the lecturer disputes this point. she says that the increase of urbanization ...
^^^
Line 7, column 293, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'reducing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'cause' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: reducing
...rbanization is not necessarily to cause to reduce the bird populations. further , he ment...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 325, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Further
...o cause to reduce the bird populations. further , he mentions that the number of differ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 332, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... to reduce the bird populations. further , he mentions that the number of differen...
^^
Line 17, column 202, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...ss, the lecturer refutes this argument. she argues that by implication of the new t...
^^^
Line 17, column 312, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...ess land to grow a huge amount of food. she also adds that the productivity and var...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, thus, whereas, in conclusion, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 30.3222958057 132% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.01324503311 259% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1693.0 1373.03311258 123% => OK
No of words: 322.0 270.72406181 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25776397516 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78553134721 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.472049689441 0.540411800872 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 508.5 419.366225166 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.6846941999 49.2860985944 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.866666667 110.228320801 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4666666667 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.8 7.06452816374 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173880493068 0.272083759551 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0567087629284 0.0996497079465 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0459469537406 0.0662205650399 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0953169594262 0.162205337803 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0348777012715 0.0443174109184 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.