In the past century, the steady growth of the human population and the corresponding increase in agriculture and pesticide use have caused much harm to wildlife in the United States,birds in particular. Unfortunately for birds, these trends are likely to continue, with the result that the number of birds in the United States will necessarily decline. First, as human populations and settlements continue to expand, birds' natural habitats will continue to disappear. Forests, wetlands, and grasslands will give way to ever more homes, malls, and offices. As the traditional areas suitable for birds keep decreasing, so will the size of the bird populations that depend on those vanishing habitats. Second, agricultural activities must increase to keep pace with the growing human population. The growth of agriculture will also result in the further destruction of bird habitats asmore and more wilderness areas are converted to agricultural use. As a result, bird populations in rural areas will continue to decline. Third, as human settlements expand and agriculture increases, the use ofchemical pesticides will also increase. Pesticides are poisons designed to kill agricultural and home garden pests, such as insects, but inevitably, pesticides get into the water and into the food chain for birds where they can harm birds. Birds that eat the poisoned insects or drink contaminated water can die as a result, and even if pesticides do not kill birds outright, they can prevent them from reproducing successfully. Sopesticides have significantly contributed to declines in bird population, and because there will continue to be a need to control agricultural pests in the future, this decline will continue.
The main idea of the both the reading and the listening is about the birds population. With in this mind, the author claims that human population and activities are declined the number of the birds in the United states by providing three kinds of these activities to support it. However, the lecturer categorically refutes all the reasons stated in the reading passage.
First, both the text and the talk discuss about the expansion of the human settlement and population. In this regard, the reading passage belief that this expansion have destroyed the birds natural habitat. Therefore, will decrease the number of the birds in the future. Conversely, the professor admit this is true just for some type of the birds, but other have benefits from this explanation. She explains that cities provides better and bigger habitat for some of them. Consequently, beside this expansion hurt some bird number, it will increase other too.
Second, both the reading and the lecture material put forth the idea of the agricultural activities. In this vein, the reading passage states that growing human population caused increase in agricultural activities which finally will destroy the bird habitats like what we seen the birds population continuously decline in rural areas. However, the lecturer says that every year fewer and fewer lands are used for agricultural way.
Third, both the reading and the lecture discuss about the chemical pesticides. In this way of thought, the reading passage demonstrated that chemical pesticides get into the water and so forth in the food chain and therefore harm the bird population. On the other hand, the lecturer opposes this notion, citing that people so understand the dangerous of the traditional pesticides, Therefore, less toxin pesticide are used every pass year and agriculture graving past resist crop.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 70, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'birds'' or 'bird's'?
Suggestion: birds'; bird's
... reading and the listening is about the birds population. With in this mind, the auth...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 274, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[1]
Message: Possible grammatical error. You used a past participle without using any required verb ('be' or 'have'). Did you mean 'saw'?
Suggestion: saw
... destroy the bird habitats like what we seen the birds population continuously decli...
^^^^
Line 5, column 283, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'birds'' or 'bird's'?
Suggestion: birds'; bird's
...the bird habitats like what we seen the birds population continuously decline in rura...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, conversely, finally, first, however, second, so, therefore, third, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1568.0 1373.03311258 114% => OK
No of words: 296.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2972972973 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63832101246 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516891891892 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 419.366225166 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.2800966183 49.2860985944 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.533333333 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7333333333 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.86666666667 7.06452816374 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195972817638 0.272083759551 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0614320090678 0.0996497079465 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0463450188984 0.0662205650399 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121304725688 0.162205337803 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0407999942502 0.0443174109184 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.