In the United States, employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day. However, many employees want to work a four-day week and are willing to accept less pay inorder to do so. A mandatory policy requiring companies to offer their employees the option of working a four-day workweekfor four-fifths (80 percent)of their normal pay would benefit the economy as a whole as well as the individual companies and the employees who decided to take the option. The shortened workweek would increase company profits because employees would feel more rested and alert, and as a result, they would make fewer costly errors in their work. Hiring morestaff to ensure that the same amount of work would be accomplished would not result in additional payroll costs because four-day employees would only be paid 80 percent of the normal rate. In the end, companies would have fewer overworked and error-prone employees for the same money, which would increase company profits. For the country as a whole, one of the primary benefits of offering this option to employees is that it would reduce unemployment rates. If many full-time employees started working fewer hours, some of their workload would have to be shifted to others. Thus, for every four employees who went on an 80 percent week, a new employee could be hired at the 80 percent rate. Finally, the option of a four-day workweek would be better for individual employees. Employees who could afford a lower salary in exchange for more free time could improve the quality of their lives by spending the extra time with their families, pursuing private interests, or enjoying leisure activities
In the passage, the author discusses three kinds of the benefits of working four-day instead of the five-day week. However, the lecturer claim that the what the reading passage states is not convincing and disputes those ideas presented in the reading passage by the several proof.
First, both the text and talk discusses the idea of economic benefit to the companies. In this regard, the belief in the reading passage is that offering four-day work week will be cause to the companies and the employees benefit who choose to work four-day. However, the lecturer refutes this view-point by saying that companies need to spend more than before because if they want to make the same amount of work they need to recruit more employees than before. Consequently, the companies need to pay for their training, medical costs and insurance. Besides, more employees means more office space and computer. which in the end will cut the companies' profits.
Second, both the reading and the listening material put forth the idea of the errors that was occurred during the jobs. In this vein, the writer make point that the workers are done fewer mistakes during their job,if they feel more relax and rested. Professor, on the other hand, says that because of the problems that mentioned in the first assertion, companies would rather not the employ more worker instead they may raise their expectation from the employees and may employees are supposed to do the same amount of the work in shorter time or in overtime working times.
Third, the author demonstrates that the employees who choose to work four-day will have more time to spend with their family and improve their life quality, while the speaker views to this issue id from an opposite angle. According to speaker, the employees would faced with less job stability and fewer promotion in their job situation or they maybe the first one how lose their job in economic down which will cause stress to their lifes'.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 268, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun proof seems to be countable; consider using: 'several proofs'.
Suggestion: several proofs
...presented in the reading passage by the several proof. First, both the text and talk discu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 179, Rule ID: BE_CAUSE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'because'?
Suggestion: because
...s that offering four-day work week will be cause to the companies and the employees bene...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 567, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
...ical costs and insurance. Besides, more employees means more office space and computer. w...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 615, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Which
...s means more office space and computer. which in the end will cut the companies profi...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 615, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...s means more office space and computer. which in the end will cut the companies profi...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 214, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , if
...are done fewer mistakes during their job,if they feel more relax and rested. Profes...
^^^
Line 5, column 392, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'worker' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: worker
..., companies would rather not the employ more worker instead they may raise their expectatio...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 265, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'face'
Suggestion: face
...cording to speaker, the employees would faced with less job stability and fewer promo...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, consequently, first, however, if, may, second, so, third, while, in short, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 30.3222958057 148% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1642.0 1373.03311258 120% => OK
No of words: 332.0 270.72406181 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94578313253 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31347263014 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 145.348785872 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503012048193 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 486.9 419.366225166 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.4530351152 49.2860985944 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.307692308 110.228320801 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5384615385 21.698381199 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.76923076923 7.06452816374 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314245418984 0.272083759551 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110389678569 0.0996497079465 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110986870667 0.0662205650399 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191048654288 0.162205337803 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0644137120717 0.0443174109184 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.3589403974 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.