Rembrandt is the most famous of the seventeenth-century Dutch painters. However, there are doubts whether some paintings attributed to Rembrandt were actually painted by him. One such painting is known as attributed to Rembrandt because of its style, and indeed the representation of the woman’s face is very much like that of portraits known to be by Rembrandt. But there are problems with the painting that suggest it could not be a work by Rembrandt. First, there is something inconsistent about the way the woman inthe portrait is dressed. She is wearing a white linen cap of a kind that only servants would wear-yet the coat she is wearing has a luxurious fur collar that no servant could afford. Rembrandt, who was known for his attention to the details of his subjects’ clothing, would not have been guilty of such an inconsistency. Second, Rembrandt was a master of painting light and shadow, but in this painting these elements do not fit together. The face appears to be illuminated by light reflected onto it from below. But below the face is the dark fur collar, which would absorb light rather than reflect it. So the face should appear partially in shadow-which is not how it appears. Rembrandt would never have made such an error. Finally, examination of the back of the painting reveals that it was painted on a panel made of several pieces of wood glued together. Although Rembrandt often painted on wood panels, no painting known to be by Rembrandt uses a panel glued together in this way from several pieces of wood. For these reasons the painting was removed from the official catalog of Rembrandt’s paintings in the 1930s.
The main idea of the both the passage and the lecture is about a portrait Which was attributes to Rembrandt, a famuse painter, in the seventeenth century. With this in mind, the passage states that the woman face portrait can't attributed to Rembrandt. The lecturer, on the other hand, categorically denies all three reasons mentioned in the passage, believing that based on the new experiments the woman face portrait can attribute to Rembrandt.
First, both the text and talk discuss the idea of the woman dress. In this line of thought, the author says that the way that the woman dress is inconsistent. Conversely, the lecture mentions that in that the fur was added to the portrait 100 years later, because some one wants to increase the value of the portrait.If the fur removed from the original painting the woman dress was suitable to each other.
Second, both of the reading and the listening materials puts forth that the idea of the light and the shadow in the portrait. In this vein, the passage states that Rembrandt shadowing was wonderful because he was master in. However, we saw some problems in the woman face shadowing. On the other hand, the lecturer opposes this notion, citing that after removing fur from original portrait. The woman light clothe was revealed. As the professor mentioned we all know that the lighter color reflects the light to woman face. Therefore, the problem in the woman face shadowing was solved.
Finally, both of the passage and lecture discuss the idea of the several piece of the panel which used for the painting. In this regard, the author posits that Rembrandt was using one piece of the wood to his painting. However, the lecturer says that even though several pieces of wood used for the portrait, they were from the same tree which glued to each other.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 223, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...age states that the woman face portrait cant attributed to Rembrandt. The lecturer, ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 265, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'someone'?
Suggestion: someone
...o the portrait 100 years later, because some one wants to increase the value of the port...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 318, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: If
...s to increase the value of the portrait.If the fur removed from the original paint...
^^
Line 3, column 318, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...s to increase the value of the portrait.If the fur removed from the original paint...
^^
Line 4, column 428, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...t. The woman light clothe was revealed. As the professor mentioned we all know tha...
^^
Line 4, column 574, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the problem in the woman face shadowing was solved. Finally, both of the pas...
^^
Line 6, column 66, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun piece seems to be countable; consider using: 'several pieces'.
Suggestion: several pieces
...age and lecture discuss the idea of the several piece of the panel which used for the paintin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, finally, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 30.3222958057 132% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1506.0 1373.03311258 110% => OK
No of words: 311.0 270.72406181 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8424437299 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41181134967 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.456591639871 0.540411800872 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 450.9 419.366225166 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 2.5761589404 272% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.5641287622 49.2860985944 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.125 110.228320801 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4375 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 7.06452816374 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.27373068433 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136069267147 0.272083759551 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0471461870797 0.0996497079465 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.052507429331 0.0662205650399 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0883927952699 0.162205337803 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.052274683681 0.0443174109184 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.3589403974 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 53.8541721854 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.0289183223 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.2367328918 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.