Populations of the yellow cedar a species of tree that is common in northwestern North America have been steadily declining for more than a century now since about 1880 Scientists have advanced several hypotheses explain this decline One hypothesis is tha

Essay topics:

Populations of the yellow cedar, a species of tree that is common in northwestern North America, have been steadily declining for more than a century now, since about 1880. Scientists have advanced several hypotheses explain this decline.

One hypothesis is that the yellow cedar decline may be caused by insect parasites, specifically the cedar bark beetle. This beetle is known to attack cedar trees; the beetle larvae eat the wood. There have been recorded instances of sustained beetle attacks overwhelming and killing yellow cedars, so this insect is a good candidate for the cause of the tree's decline.

A second hypothesis attributes the decline to brown bears. Bears sometimes claw at the cedars in order to eat the tree bark, which has a high sugar content. In fact, the cedar bark can contain as much sugar as the wild berries that are a staple of the bears' diet. Although the bears' clawing is unlikely to destroy trees by itself, their aggressive feeding habits may critically weaken enough trees to be responsible for the decline.

The third hypothesis states that gradual changes of climate may be to blame. Over the last hundred years, the patterns of seasonal as well as day-to-day temperatures have changed in northwestern North America. These changes have affected the root systems of the yellow cedar trees: the fine surface roots now start growing in the late winter rather than in the early spring. The change in the timing of root growth may have significant consequences. Growing roots are sensitive and are therefore likely to suffer damage from partial freezing on cold winter nights. This frozen root damage may be capable of undermining the health of the whole tree, eventually killing it.

Word Count: 267

Both passage and lecture focus upon the debate on the various approaches to the reduction of the yellow cedar population in some areas of North America. The author put forward certain claims which are disregarded by the speaker. The lecturer states a few counterpoints to advocate her opinion.
First, according to the author insects such as bark beetle caused the cedars to decline steadily. In turn, It demonstrates that the tree is eaten by their larvae and causes the damage of cedars. On the other hand, the speaker states that yellow cedars are resistant to these species of insects, and fundamentally bark beetles could not be damaged cause and the cedar contains poison and makes the beetle away.
Second, the author claims that brown bears claws at the cedars so as to provide food that contains sugar and it causes the cedars harm. On the contrary, the lecturer professes that bears could not make problem for cedars because they are not able to damage the trees. Also, they knew that in that specific area there bears that are living.
Third, the lecture proposes that gradually climate change in the last century, and the daily and seasonal fluctuation has had a freezing effect on the rooting system of trees which cause this death. Controversially, the spokesman refutes this notion by saying that if the falling temperature caused the root of trees damage, it would happen in a higher altitude with lower temperatures more than the lower altitude. Because this freezing has happened at the lower altitude too, where the climate is warmer, it cannot be the real reason.

Votes
Average: 8.5 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-08-09 nusybah 68 view
2022-11-03 anman 70 view
2022-10-23 HSNDEK 80 view
2022-10-23 HSNDEK 73 view
2022-08-05 Hello GRE 80 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user NazaninLing :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 64, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...ms that brown bears claws at the cedars so as to provide food that contains sugar and it...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, so, third, as to, such as, on the contrary, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1320.0 1373.03311258 96% => OK
No of words: 267.0 270.72406181 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94382022472 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45052032586 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569288389513 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 406.8 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.2703309727 49.2860985944 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.0 110.228320801 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 21.698381199 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 7.06452816374 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131844776191 0.272083759551 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.043415133444 0.0996497079465 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0353454815941 0.0662205650399 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0727741238323 0.162205337803 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0157302259589 0.0443174109184 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 63.6247240618 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.