Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
It is generally acknowledged that both views, being able to communicate, and having a suitable level of education are having a profound impact on our future job. However, as for me, I prefer studying hard, gain good ability in learning things, and accumulating knowledge.
First, if we have good knowledge of our majors, knowing well on how to use it, we can make a firm standing on our future jobs, providing our jobs are relating to our academic studies. The employers want good performance, and the performance of work lies in the ability to do well on tasks, which, of course, needs the good ability of our specialties or majors. If we had studied hard in school, we could probably have gained enough skills and knowledge on our majors, resulting in the great capability of our specialty. As a consequence, we can succeed in our future jobs.
Second, given the status quo, If we all know how a high level of knowledge might be highly beneficial for us, we will try to attain various knowledge. The fact is, knowledge is an important element in a future job and as opposed to relationships with others. While individuals gain knowledge in a variety of disciplines, they could reach higher stages of life and be more successful, because achievements come from science. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. When I was younger, I have chosen to work immediately after graduation from high school without gaining a university degree. At that time, I proud myself to be able to find a career, but after a while, I found out without having enough knowledge, it would not be practical and only relations could not help me in the long run. Based on that experience, I think that it was better to study and complete my proper education, then hiring for a career so as to be more successful.
Lastly, even though there really are some people who lack real ability such as good specialty or learning new things who can thrive for good relations with other people, they are not really successful. They might occupy some high-ranked positions such as managers or chairmen, but they lack the required ability. All the other coworkers would just despise them, and the resulting gossips and bad performance would drive them away. In the end, they will fail. It is one who acquires the needed ability can succeed really, not ones with good relations.
All in all, by taking all the points into account, I vehemently oppose with the statement due to the reasons mentioned above. Not only studying hard reach us to a better future job, but also having a good job comes from a high level of education.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-01 | Verman94 | 71 | view |
| 2023-02-17 | zaid | 73 | view |
| 2022-10-30 | Umme Abiha | 60 | view |
| 2022-10-18 | anman | 70 | view |
| 2022-10-18 | Kalyani_tekade_24 | 85 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours 70
- Many consumers ignore commercial advertisements In response advertising companies have started using a new tactic called buzzing The advertisers hire people buzzers who personally promote buzz products to people they know or meet The key part is that the 90
- Private collectors have been selling and buying fossils the petrified remains of ancient organisms ever since the eighteenth century In recent years however the sale of fossils particularly of dinosaurs and other large vertebrates has grown into a big bus 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement For success in a future job the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- In the United States employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day However many employees want to work a four day week and are willing to accept less pay in order to do so A mandatory policy requiring companies to offer their employee 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 928, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...per education, then hiring for a career so as to be more successful. Lastly, even thou...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, lastly, really, second, so, then, well, while, as for, as to, i think, of course, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2154.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 454.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74449339207 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61598047577 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68382828624 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 245.0 212.727598566 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539647577093 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 675.9 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 18.0 9.59856630824 188% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.51792114695 256% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0042551265 48.9658058833 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.7 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.45110844103 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185116556741 0.236089414692 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0546197832899 0.076458572812 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0399181824165 0.0737576698707 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103720552231 0.150856017488 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0235354914521 0.0645574589148 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 11.7677419355 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 86.8835125448 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.