portrait of an elderly woman in a white bonnet

Essay topics:

portrait of an elderly woman in a white bonnet

both of the reading and the lecture discuss the portrait of an elderly woman in a white bonnet, while the passage notes some problem in the painting and claims it does not belong to Rembrandt. the lecture disagrees and provides explanations to those issues.
first, the reading states that this paint shows a contrast in the woman's clothes. she looks with a cap of servants but her fur collar indicates that she's not that kind which unacceptable in Rembrandt's work. however, the lecture explains this issue by saying that the fur collar is not part of the original painting and it's just added later to increase the value of the painting
second, the reading claims that the fur collar absorbs the light instead of reflecting it to make the face appears more shining. the lecture insists that error attributed to the fur collar which added later once it removed the original collar could be seen and with simple light-colored clothes the collar reflects light to illuminate the woman's face and make it partially in shadow
finally, the reading asserts that the panel used to draw this painting was shaped by many types of wood glued. the lecture pointed out when the fur collar added the panel of the painting was enlarged with extra pieces of wood glued to make the painting more valuable

Votes
Average: 6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-06-06 YasamanEsml 73 view
2023-03-07 ayumiyazaki 81 view
2022-12-09 Kairavishah2001 73 view
2022-11-16 rpinisetti8 73 view
2022-10-13 EiLonMask 73 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Both
both of the reading and the lecture discuss ...
^^^^
Line 1, column 194, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...claims it does not belong to Rembrandt. the lecture disagrees and provides explanat...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: First
...provides explanations to those issues. first, the reading states that this paint sho...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 82, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...shows a contrast in the womans clothes. she looks with a cap of servants but her fu...
^^^
Line 2, column 149, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: she's
...vants but her fur collar indicates that shes not that kind which unacceptable in Rem...
^^^^
Line 2, column 207, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
... which unacceptable in Rembrandts work. however, the lecture explains this issue by say...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 377, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er to increase the value of the painting second, the reading claims that the fur ...
^^^
Line 3, column 130, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
... to make the face appears more shining. the lecture insists that error attributed t...
^^^
Line 3, column 383, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ans face and make it partially in shadow finally, the reading asserts that the pa...
^^^
Line 4, column 112, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...was shaped by many types of wood glued. the lecture pointed out when the fur collar...
^^^
Line 4, column 267, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...glued to make the painting more valuable
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, look, second, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1071.0 1373.03311258 78% => OK
No of words: 223.0 270.72406181 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80269058296 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31380574767 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 145.348785872 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.520179372197 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 321.3 419.366225166 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 13.0662251656 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 21.2450331126 146% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 104.419092789 49.2860985944 212% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 153.0 110.228320801 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.8571428571 21.698381199 147% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57142857143 7.06452816374 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 4.19205298013 262% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127325438646 0.272083759551 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0751808707547 0.0996497079465 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.143970096931 0.0662205650399 217% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100919166321 0.162205337803 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.143280808402 0.0443174109184 323% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.3589403974 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.93 53.8541721854 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.0289183223 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 63.6247240618 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.498013245 137% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.