teamwork in the united states
Summarise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage.
The article introduces the topic of a four-day workweek. More specifically the author discusses the benefits of offering a four-day workweek. The lecture in the listening passage disagrees. He believes that offering employees four-day workweek will affect negatively on the economy as a whole and attack each of the claims made in the topic
In the reading passage. The author mentioned that taking this option will benefit companies and increase their profits however in the listening passage the speaker is doubtful that is offering this option will force companies to spend more, adding new workers drive companies to put much money for training theme, also their medical beneficial is worthy wither they are four-day or five-day workers and remember having more employees require more computers and offices.
The author also stated that taking a four-day workweek will provide job opportunities and decrease the unemployment rate. on the other hand, the professor In the listening passage is unconvinced about the job opportunities that will exist unless employees take the four-day option, because hiring new workers is expensive which may lead companies to begin asking their employees to handle other jobs, On top of that companies might start expecting that four-day or five-day employees can do the same amount of job and probably that lead job opportunities to be worse.
Another reason why the author supports a four-day workweek is that it gives employees extra time to be with family or enjoy other activities. In the listening, the speaker said the extra time will be given for four-day employees maybe putt them in risk and prevent them from advancing in the company and make sure that the short week worker are lucky to lose their job once the economy is down finally they might be passed over for promotion basically companies prefer five-day worker in a management position.
To sum up. Both the writer and professor hold conflicting views about a four-day workweek. It’s clear that they will have trouble finding some common ground on this issue.
- the lecture and the reading are about the portrait of the elderly woman in a white bonnet whether it made by Rembrandt or not first the author stated contradictory about the woman dressing in the painting however the professor provides a further explanati 10
- teamwork in the united states Summarise the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage 3
- portrait of an elderly woman in a white bonnet 60
- TOEFL T P O 2 Integrated Writing Task 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 341, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ack each of the claims made in the topic In the reading passage. The author menti...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 122, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: On
...ies and decrease the unemployment rate. on the other hand, the professor In the li...
^^
Line 3, column 568, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hat lead job opportunities to be worse. Another reason why the author supports a...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing some common ground on this issue.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, however, if, may, so, to sum up, on the other hand, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1741.0 1373.03311258 127% => OK
No of words: 335.0 270.72406181 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19701492537 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57617993391 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 145.348785872 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513432835821 0.540411800872 95% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 419.366225166 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 21.2450331126 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 150.249491587 49.2860985944 305% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 145.083333333 110.228320801 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.9166666667 21.698381199 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 7.06452816374 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0783990819098 0.272083759551 29% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0371517799107 0.0996497079465 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0345085503201 0.0662205650399 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0472793254626 0.162205337803 29% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0193773056071 0.0443174109184 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.3589403974 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 53.8541721854 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.0289183223 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 63.6247240618 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.498013245 122% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.