problems that archaeological faced in Britain
Both the lecture and the passage are about problems that archaeological faced in Britain. The author of the passage describes these problems. On the contrary, the lecturer contradicts various viewpoints mentioned in the passage based on the improvement that the new procedure produce.
To begin with, The author of the passage mentions on this point that the new constructions that occurred in Britain, due to the population increase can cause keeping the eyes of builders blind to valuable archaeological sites in order to earn more profit. However, the lecturer asserts that according to the new procedure before starting to build a new construction the site must examine by an archaeologist.
In addition, the author of the passage argues that decreasing government support and grant could affect initiate of new projects. On the other hand, the lecturer mentions that new excavating projects can get financial support from construction companies instead of the government and it includes not only initiating but the preservation process too.
Finally, the writer claims that there Are fewer positions available for archaeologists and, are limited to universities or few government agencies. In contrast, the professor thinks that thanks to the new guideline, establishes a new position for companies which supported the archaeological process yet they paid for a new job that exited. In addition, Writing new articles based on findings has become more popular.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-26 | HRBM | 76 | view |
| 2022-12-15 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 81 | view |
| 2021-11-01 | Harshitha2623 | 85 | view |
| 2021-02-14 | fmichela | 65 | view |
| 2021-01-03 | talelaldabous | 65 | view |
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, so, in addition, in contrast, on the contrary, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.4613686534 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1245.0 1373.03311258 91% => OK
No of words: 227.0 270.72406181 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4845814978 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0545316494 2.5805825403 118% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 145.348785872 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.577092511013 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 378.9 419.366225166 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.6923388905 49.2860985944 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.5 110.228320801 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7 21.698381199 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2 7.06452816374 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13737837863 0.272083759551 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0743886653626 0.0996497079465 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.172139291697 0.0662205650399 260% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0925065645819 0.162205337803 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0983806695893 0.0443174109184 222% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.3589403974 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.8541721854 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.0289183223 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 12.2367328918 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.42419426049 114% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, so, in addition, in contrast, on the contrary, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.4613686534 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1245.0 1373.03311258 91% => OK
No of words: 227.0 270.72406181 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4845814978 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0545316494 2.5805825403 118% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 145.348785872 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.577092511013 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 378.9 419.366225166 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.6923388905 49.2860985944 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.5 110.228320801 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7 21.698381199 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2 7.06452816374 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13737837863 0.272083759551 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0743886653626 0.0996497079465 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.172139291697 0.0662205650399 260% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0925065645819 0.162205337803 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0983806695893 0.0443174109184 222% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.3589403974 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.8541721854 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.0289183223 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 12.2367328918 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.42419426049 114% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.