Question : Summarise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage.
The reading and the lecture are both about the Portrait of an Elderly Woman in a White Bonnet. The author of the reading feels that this painting was not made by the Rembrandt. The lecture, however, challenges the claims made by the author. She is of the opinion that the author opinion's are fallacy.
To begin with, the author argues that the painting can not be made by the Rembrandt because there is a inconsistent way about the woman in the portrait is dressed. The article mention that the woman is wearing a luxurious fur collar, but the Rembrandt, who was known for his attention to the details, would not have been guity of such inconsistency. This specific argument is challenged by the lecture. She argues that this luxurious fur collar was not there since the beginning, someone painted this fur collar to increase the value of the painting. Moreover, she says that the painting was modificaded 100 years ago.
Secondly, the writter suggest that the face of the woman appears to be illuminated by light reflected onto it from below. In addition, the author said that the master of light and shadow, Rembrandt, would never have made this kind of mistake. The lecture, in the other hand, opposes this by mentioning that the original painting was a collar that illuminated this painting. Furthermore, in the begining of the lecture she said that the painting was analyzed by a Scientific departament that proved the bond between the Portrait of an Elderly Woman in a White Bonnet and the Remrandt.
- TPO9 Question Summarise the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage Car manufacturers and governments have been eagerly seeking a replacement for the automobile s main source of p 3
- TPO13 Question Summarise the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage 61
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours 66
- TPO26 Question Summarise the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 178, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...painting was not made by the Rembrandt. The lecture, however, challenges the claims...
^^^
Line 3, column 102, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... made by the Rembrandt because there is a inconsistent way about the woman in the...
^
Line 5, column 275, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mistake. The lecture, in the other hand, opposes this by mentioning that the orig...
^^
Line 5, column 360, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l painting was a collar that illuminated this painting. Furthermore, in the begin...
^^
Line 5, column 488, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...was analyzed by a Scientific departament that proved the bond between the Portrai...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, in addition, kind of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1253.0 1373.03311258 91% => OK
No of words: 259.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83783783784 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58921694037 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 145.348785872 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.46332046332 0.540411800872 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 381.6 419.366225166 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0783698846 49.2860985944 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.3846153846 110.228320801 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9230769231 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.06452816374 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0930418544719 0.272083759551 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0439497443242 0.0996497079465 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0436793844442 0.0662205650399 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0795691415586 0.162205337803 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0414582378515 0.0443174109184 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.2367328918 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.