Rambrandt's work of art (TPO 3)
In the lecture, the professor explains why the portrait of an elderly woman in white bunt is actually painted by Rambrandt, just the opposite of the passage. She proves that all three reasons given in passage are not true.
First, the professor talks about first reason stated in passage which is about inconsistency in woman's cloth. She says in fact the fur color was not a part of actual painting and it was added by someone else about one hundred years after the original painting was created.
Second, the actual painting was a work of art in which the element light and shadow was painted expertly. In current painting, we can see the reflection of light onto face from below though what is under face is dark fur. In fact, the color of the fur is something which again, is added after Rambrandt illustrated the painting and when it is removed, we can see that the reflection effect is painted correctly.
Third, the painting was actually painted on one single panel, as would be expected from Rambrandt, but after it was done someone glued some pieces of wood together in order to make the painting more valuable. It is something that can be seen in other Rambrandt works such as his self portrait with hat.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-07-21 | shirin Mozaffari | 76 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement:In twenty years there will be less cars in use than there are today. 73
- Were dinosaurs Reptiles or Endotherms? 86
- write about some one who is considered as a leader in the world. 70
- life today is easier than past 60
- traditional encyclopedias vs online ones 86
Discourse Markers used:
['actually', 'but', 'first', 'second', 'so', 'third', 'in fact', 'such as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.255319148936 0.261695866417 98% => OK
Verbs: 0.174468085106 0.158904122519 110% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0595744680851 0.0723426182421 82% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0468085106383 0.0435111971325 108% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0382978723404 0.0277247811725 138% => OK
Prepositions: 0.16170212766 0.128828473217 126% => OK
Participles: 0.0553191489362 0.0370669169778 149% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.36836917006 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Infinitives: 0.00425531914894 0.0208969081088 20% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0936170212766 0.128158765124 73% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0170212765957 0.0158828679856 107% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0297872340426 0.0114777025283 260% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1215.0 1645.83664459 74% => OK
No of words: 215.0 271.125827815 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.6511627907 6.08160592843 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 4.04852973271 95% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.302325581395 0.374372842146 81% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.227906976744 0.287516216867 79% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.162790697674 0.187439937562 87% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0744186046512 0.113142543107 66% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36836917006 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 145.348785872 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.562790697674 0.539623497131 104% => OK
Word variations: 52.8161747622 53.8517498576 98% => OK
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0529801325 69% => OK
Sentence length: 23.8888888889 21.7502111507 110% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8949390862 49.3711431718 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.0 132.220823453 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8888888889 21.7502111507 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.888888888889 0.878197800319 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.39072847682 0% => OK
Readability: 46.6795865633 50.5018328374 92% => OK
Elegance: 1.81967213115 1.90840788429 95% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0811520104473 0.549887131256 15% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.1731952569 0.142949733639 121% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.114839350876 0.0787303798458 146% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.666748863642 0.631733273073 106% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.148349918561 0.139662658121 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0445289123382 0.266732575781 17% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0524802946327 0.103435571967 51% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.34270500472 0.414875509568 83% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0386238689414 0.0530846634433 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0537976600895 0.40443939384 13% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0297450159275 0.0528353158467 56% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.26048565121 141% => OK
Positive topic words: 2.0 3.49668874172 57% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 3.62251655629 28% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 6.0 3.1766004415 189% => OK
Total topic words: 9.0 10.2958057395 87% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.