The reading and the lecture are both about the habitabality of Venus. The author of the reading believes that extreme conditions on Venus makes in uninhabitable for human. The claims made by the author are challenged by the lecturer. He is of the opinion that although it is difficult for men to live on Venus surface, they can fabricate a floating station 50 kilometers above the planet's surface.
The reading and the lecture are both about the habitabality of Venus. The author of the reading believes that extreme conditions on Venus makes in uninhabitable for human. The claims made by the author are challenged by the lecturer. He is of the opinion that although it is difficult for men to live on Venus surface, they can fabricate a floating station 50 kilometers above the planet's surface.
First of all, the author suggests that the high pressure at Venus' surface is one the most significant challanges for human. It is stated in the reading that the pressure is at least 90 times bigger than that of the Earth's suface and can wreck everything lands on Venus' surface. The lecturer refutes this specific argument by explaining that although the pressure is substantially high at venus' surface, it is considerably more moderate in 50 kilometers above the planet's surface, and humans can easily withstand this pressure.
Secondly, the author posits that oxygen and water are two essential factors for a habitat to be habitable for mankind, and Venus lacks such crucial substances and importing them from the Earth is not rational. Therefore, Venus can not support human life. The lecturer, on the other hand, believes that even though the planet does not have water or oxygen, it has chemical substances that can be used to produce these matters; consequently, there is no need to import these substances from the Earth.
Finally, the author proposes that the Venus' atmosphere reflects most of the light emited from sun, and a small portion of it reaches the planets surface, which makes it tough to make electricity and charge machines and equipments. The lecturer, however, rebuts this by argueing that the amount of sunlight recieved at 50 kilometers away from the planet's surface is more than enough. He notes that the reflection of sunlight caused by the clouds provides the station with even more sunlight than is expected to be recieved directly from the sun.
- Migrating to a new city or country is indeed a tricky thing to do Personally I believe that migration is beneficial for individuals I thinks this way for two main reasons which I will explore in the following essay 70
- The reading and the lecture are both about the habitabality of Venus The author of the reading believes that extreme conditions on Venus makes in uninhabitable for human The claims made by the author are challenged by the lecturer He is of the opinion tha 80
- Migrating to a new city or country is indeed a tricky thing to do Personally I believe that migration is beneficial for individuals I thinks this way for two main reasons which I will explore in the following essay 71
- The reading and the lecture are both about the creator of some pieces of photographic negatives The author of the reading believes that based on evidence the photographies belong to Ansel Adams The claims made by the author are challenged by the lecturer 76
- The reading and the lecture are both about the functions of some prehistoric paintings attributed to caves in southwestern France The author of the reading believes that based on the evidence these paintings were made to ensure a successful hunt The claim 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 173, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...Venus makes in uninhabitable for human. The claims made by the author are challenge...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, finally, first, however, if, second, secondly, therefore, at least, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 30.3222958057 132% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1650.0 1373.03311258 120% => OK
No of words: 330.0 270.72406181 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62487920051 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 517.5 419.366225166 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.4861065702 49.2860985944 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.923076923 110.228320801 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3846153846 21.698381199 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.07692307692 7.06452816374 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.368664026321 0.272083759551 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.174728139196 0.0996497079465 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.182661108556 0.0662205650399 276% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.254649806342 0.162205337803 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.235998708802 0.0443174109184 533% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.3589403974 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 53.8541721854 86% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.0289183223 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 63.6247240618 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.