There is usually a long queue of people waiting to buy a technological product instantly before a product gets released. Personally, I believe that it is better to wait a while after a product is released and then decide whether to buy it or not. I think this way for two main reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, you can use other individuals' experiences if you wait. There is no user comment at first When a technological product like a mobile phone becomes available. However, after a few weeks, you can read other people's comments regarding the product and then make a rational decision based on these comments. My personal experience is a compelling illustration of this. Six years ago, A friend of mine and I decided to buy laptops for university assignments. My friend bought a freshly-released notebook without researching it so much. On the other hand, I chose to buy another laptop that was available for several months. I still have the laptop because I studied lots of comments about it to finally persuade myself to buy it. My friend, however, found his notebook broken two months after he bought it. It crashed because a small amount of water had been poured into it accidentally.
Secondly, it is probable that after a while, better products become available by opponent companies. The Technological device market is highly competitive, and it is likely that a company will produce a similar product that outperforms the currently available one after a few weeks or so. For instance, last year I wanted to buy a new mobile phone. I had two options from the Samsung brand, which had been released recently. For some reason, I decided to wait for another month before choosing between them. After about two weeks, I found a new Xiaomi mobile phone that was much better than Samsung alternatives relative to its price.
In summary, I am of the opinion that it is more logical to wait for a few months before buying a freshly-released technological product. You can gather information about other users' experiences in case of those products are released for a while. Also, it is likely that after a few months, a more qualified device becomes available by rival brands.
- The reading and the lecture are both about the functions of some prehistoric paintings attributed to caves in southwestern France The author of the reading believes that based on the evidence these paintings were made to ensure a successful hunt The claim 78
- The reading and the lecture are both about the effects of palm trees expantion on the environment and the economy The author of the reading believes that producing palm oil has multiple advantages and should be promoted The claims made by the author are c 76
- Migrating to a new city or country is indeed a tricky thing to do Personally I believe that migration is beneficial for individuals I thinks this way for two main reasons which I will explore in the following essay 71
- Migrating to a new city or country is indeed a tricky thing to do Personally I believe that migration is beneficial for individuals I thinks this way for two main reasons which I will explore in the following essay 70
- The reading and the lecture are both about TLP brief flashes of light emited from moon s surfuce The author of the reading believes that there are three possible explanation for this phenomena The claims made by the author are challenged by the lecturer H 68
Comments
There are several reasons…
There are several reasons why it is better to wait until a product is released before making a purchase. One of them is that the initial fnf vs rainbow friends version of the product may have some flaws.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, still, then, while, for instance, in summary, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1568.0 1977.66487455 79% => OK
No of words: 319.0 407.700716846 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91536050157 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88502776189 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557993730408 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.293003652 48.9658058833 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.5263157895 100.406767564 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7894736842 20.6045352989 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.63157894737 5.45110844103 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.53405017921 66% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287158769502 0.236089414692 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.083037758517 0.076458572812 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0696408569631 0.0737576698707 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218644909029 0.150856017488 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0363919464177 0.0645574589148 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 11.7677419355 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.96 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 86.8835125448 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.