The reading passage asserts that Edmontsosaur were able to survive in severe winter time since they were migrating south to more hospitable regions The lecturer however finds the idea dubious and casts doubt on the reasons proposed by the reading passage

Essay topics:

The reading passage asserts that Edmontsosaur were able to survive in severe winter time since they were migrating south to more hospitable regions. The lecturer, however, finds the idea dubious and casts doubt on the reasons proposed by the reading passage.
The author argues that Edmontosaurs were feeding from plants which were not capable to grow during the cold and dark and severe North Slope winter. Conversely, the lecturer brings up the idea that they did not migrate for finding and eating foods and plants. Actually the temperature for growing plants were so good. In winter the Edmontosaurs could eat dead vegetation which were left and could live on from dead plants.
Furthermore, the reading passage holds the view that Edmontosaurs skeletons have been unearthed from the same site that asserts that they live in herd which could help them to migrate. On the contrary, the professor underlines the fact that they live in herd for extra protection. living in herbs could not provide evidence for migration claim.
Finally, the reading asserts that edmonosaurs were physically able to migrate long distances for reaching to more hospitable regions. In contrast, the speaker dismisses this issue due to the fact that the infant edmonosaurs could not migrate long distances and also Jevelious could not survive on their own in North.

The reading passage asserts that Edmontsosaur were able to survive in severe winter time since they were migrating south to more hospitable regions. The lecturer, however, finds the idea dubious and casts doubt on the reasons proposed by the reading passage.
The author argues that Edmontosaurs were feeding from plants which were not capable to grow during the cold and dark and severe North Slope winter. Conversely, the lecturer brings up the idea that they did not migrate for finding and eating foods and plants. Actually the temperature for growing plants were so good. In winter the Edmontosaurs could eat dead vegetation which were left and could live on from dead plants.
Furthermore, the reading passage holds the view that Edmontosaurs skeletons have been unearthed from the same site that asserts that they live in herd which could help them to migrate. On the contrary, the professor underlines the fact that they live in herd for extra protection. living in herbs could not provide evidence for migration claim.
Finally, the reading asserts that edmonosaurs were physically able to migrate long distances for reaching to more hospitable regions. In contrast, the speaker dismisses this issue due to the fact that the infant edmonosaurs could not migrate long distances and also Jevelious could not survive on their own in North.

Votes
Average: 6.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-02-08 ghmohamad 68 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user ghmohamad :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 115, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re winter time since they were migrating south to more hospitable regions. The le...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...asons proposed by the reading passage. The author argues that Edmontosaurs were fe...
^^^
Line 3, column 281, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Living
...they live in herd for extra protection. living in herbs could not provide evidence for...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, conversely, finally, furthermore, however, so, in contrast, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1133.0 1373.03311258 83% => OK
No of words: 218.0 270.72406181 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19724770642 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49897293944 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 145.348785872 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52752293578 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 337.5 419.366225166 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.433600298 49.2860985944 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.0 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8181818182 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.27272727273 7.06452816374 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.444448356154 0.272083759551 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.169865878657 0.0996497079465 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.185210624205 0.0662205650399 280% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.311802156923 0.162205337803 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.284209354395 0.0443174109184 641% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 63.6247240618 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.