The author in the reading states that the painting named "Portrait of an Elderly in a White Bonnet" attributed to Rembrandt is inaccurate. He suggests that it is not a work done by Rembrandt. The professor in the lecture disagrees. She says, although, points made in reading are true, new research shows that, indeed, the painting is made by Rembrandt.
First, the author asserts that the way in which the woman in the portrait is dressed inconsistently which doesn't match the accuracy for which Rembrandt was known. The lecturer, while accepting the argument, claims that the further research on the painting by X-Ray and analysis of color pigment shows that the painting was modified 100 years later to make it more appealing, to make it look more formal.
Second, the author says that Rembrandt never used to make mistakes of lighting and shadows in his painting. The painting discussed here has some issues related to this. The lecturer refutes this argument by saying that if the modification done on the painting is removed then the sense of light and shadow matches perfectly.
Originally, she was wearing a simple light colored fur collar, which would allow the light to pass and makes it look illuminated.
Finally, the author states that the painting has several different pieces of wood glued together but Rembrandt often painted on single wood panel. Once again, the lecturer disagrees. She goes on to say to in order to make the painting look more valuable and grander these additional pieces were glued to its top, bottom and sides later on during modification. Moreover, the wooden piece on which painting is from the same tree which Rembrandt used for painting one of his pervious painting.
- It is more important for students to understand ideas and concepts than it is for them to learn facts 80
- Sea otters are a small mammal that lives in the waters along North America 039 s west coast from California to Alaska A few years ago some of the sea otter populations off the Alaskan coast started to decline rapidly which raised several concerns becau 81
- Communal online encyclopedias represent one of the latest resources to be found on the Internet They are in many respects like traditional printed encyclopedias collections of articles on various subjects What is specific to these online encyclopedias 87
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporti
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Young people enjoy life more than old people do Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer Be sure to use your own words Do not use memorized examples 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 107, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ortrait is dressed inconsistently which doesnt match the accuracy for which Rembrandt ...
^^^^^^
Line 8, column 50, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'several'.
Suggestion: several
...the author states that the painting has several different pieces of wood glued together but Rembr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, look, moreover, second, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1441.0 1373.03311258 105% => OK
No of words: 286.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03846153846 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62383409437 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541958041958 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.2641818857 49.2860985944 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.928571429 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4285714286 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.57142857143 7.06452816374 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283081013127 0.272083759551 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0969059560684 0.0996497079465 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0667211701325 0.0662205650399 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146681620847 0.162205337803 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0883776808669 0.0443174109184 199% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.