summaries the point made in the lecture

Essay topics:

summaries the point made in the lecture .

The reading passage depicts doubts of the opponent about the memoir of the chevalier. The critics of the chevalier believe chevalier has exaggerated his life events to seek more attention. The lecturer represents evidence to prove the chevalier memoir is authentic.
The reading passage proclaims according to the chevalier memoir he used to spent colossal amount of the money when he was in Switzerland. In actual he was not the rich person he had a lot of debt from banks. However, the lecturer argues chevalier had huge real estate in Switzerland and he had sold his all property. It took a while to get his money from the sold property so he took a loan for that time being.
The author of the reading claims chevalier conversation between him and a famous writer written in the memoir is fake. Chevalier met this famous writer may years ago and it is not possible to remember each word said by a famous writer. On the contrary, the lecturer states the day conversation happened between them chevalier wrote everything when he got back home. Even the memoir has been written after a long time of the conversation chevalier used his notes for reference. Thus whatever written in the memoir is true.
The reading passage assumes the chevalier did not break the jail instead of it he would have given money to the jail official to let him go. In contrast, the speaker asserts government documents sates that they had to repair the selling of the jail after a chevalier run. Therefore the chevalier would have broken that selling to run away from the jail

Votes
Average: 0.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-12-07 Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya 63 view
2020-08-09 Maryam Eshaghian 3 view
2020-06-25 georgia 80 view
2020-05-16 randyjones 3 view
2019-12-31 NIMA SAEEDI 88 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user randyjones :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 190, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...his life events to seek more attention. The lecturer represents evidence to prove t...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ove the chevalier memoir is authentic. The reading passage proclaims according to ...
^^^
Line 3, column 477, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...chevalier used his notes for reference. Thus whatever written in the memoir is true....
^^^^
Line 4, column 272, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ling of the jail after a chevalier run. Therefore the chevalier would have broken that se...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, so, then, therefore, thus, while, in contrast, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1288.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 271.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75276752768 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55083793002 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505535055351 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 398.7 419.366225166 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.7029752816 49.2860985944 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 85.8666666667 110.228320801 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0666666667 21.698381199 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 7.06452816374 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0353457896498 0.272083759551 13% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0160796080174 0.0996497079465 16% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0331642826374 0.0662205650399 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.024745403478 0.162205337803 15% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.016572280106 0.0443174109184 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.3589403974 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.97 12.2367328918 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.15 8.42419426049 85% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 63.6247240618 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.