Summarize the point made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific details made in the reading passage.
In contrast to the Reading passage, which emphasizes on reduced number of people interested on literature and poems and provides three reasons of support, the professor claims people are involve on other form of intellectual programs and refutes each point made in the reading.
First, the reading claims that people now are less interested on literature which extend the knowledge and intellectuality of the people. However, the professor refute this point, she claims that people now a days are involved in study of history, scientific facts which is not literature though enhance the intellectuality of the person.
Second, the reading posit that people are involve in nonintellectual acts such as listening to music, movies and superficial reading. The professor opposes this point by saying that a good plot of movies, music improves the imaginative capability and knowledge; not actually the waste of time.
Finally, the reading states that good literature work is dying due to lack of sufficient audience. However, the professor claims that difficulty and complexities in understanding the modern literature is the reason behind decreasing audience.
- Books can be divided into two main types; fictional (novels & stories) and non-fictional (histories, biographies, & self –help books, for example). Which of these two types of book do you generally prefer to read? Use specific reasons & deta 73
- Summarize the points made in the lecture that you have just heard, discussing how they cast doubt on parts made in the reading, you can refer the reading passage as you write. 3
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 66
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 90
- Summarize the points in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 203, Rule ID: NOW_A_DAYS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nowadays'?
Suggestion: nowadays
...fute this point, she claims that people now a days are involved in study of history, scien...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 207, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a day' or simply 'days'?
Suggestion: a day; days
... this point, she claims that people now a days are involved in study of history, scien...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, finally, first, however, if, second, so, in contrast, such as, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 22.412803532 40% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 984.0 1373.03311258 72% => OK
No of words: 178.0 270.72406181 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52808988764 5.08290768461 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 4.04702891845 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99854781164 2.5805825403 116% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 145.348785872 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.550561797753 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 305.1 419.366225166 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 13.0662251656 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.2176264734 49.2860985944 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.571428571 110.228320801 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4285714286 21.698381199 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.4285714286 7.06452816374 176% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0893618263082 0.272083759551 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0412255166639 0.0996497079465 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0362832000438 0.0662205650399 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.057568669871 0.162205337803 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0398799997713 0.0443174109184 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.3589403974 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 53.8541721854 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.0289183223 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.09 12.2367328918 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 63.6247240618 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.7273730684 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.