summarize the points made in the lecture about different hypothesis for little ice age generation, being sure to explain how they oppose specific points made in the reading passage about reasons for little ice age period.
The reading discusses the possible explanations for little ice age period. However, the professor in the lecture totally disagrees with the reasons mentioned in the reading and gives his own reasons to support his opinion about the reading's point of view which he considers problematic.
First, the article mentions that the little ice age may be caused by the ocean currents disruption phenomena. But, professor indicates that the little ice age covered whole the planet and not just the Europe and america where these current disruption accurred. So, there is not any solid evidence that ocean currents disruption could have caused the little ice age in other places like southern america.
Second, the passage assumes that the volcanic eruption and its related activities may probably bring about this incident. On the other hand, he opposes this assumption and thinks that it could have not been the reason for little ice age, since there are no other reports about volcanic eruptions' other consequences like visual impacts that these gas clouds may have on sun and its color. Thus, their influence was not as large as what the reading believes.
Third, the reading reminds the human's great population reduction and considers it as a reason for little ice age encounter. In contrast, professor believes that this belief is problematic, as the population decrease have compensated and human population started to radically grow in a short period of time. As a result they began to cut the trees again to provide themselves with agricultural lands to produce different crops. So, there would not be enough time for them to generate a large amount of green house gases to affect the climate substantially.
- summarize the points made in the lecture about the writer of a manuscript, being sure to explain how they cast doubt to the theories made in the passage about the true writer of Voynich book. 83
- After they complete their university studies some students live in their home towns others live in different towns or cities Which do you think is better living in your hometown or living in different towns or cities 89
- People should sometimes do things that they do not enjoy doing 37
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 81
- Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Others believe that it is best to use that time doing things related to schoolwork. Which 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 292, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...on started to radically grow in a short period of time. As a result they began to cut the tree...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 308, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...dically grow in a short period of time. As a result they began to cut the trees ag...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, second, so, third, thus, in contrast, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1443.0 1373.03311258 105% => OK
No of words: 279.0 270.72406181 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17204301075 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57696870738 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 145.348785872 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573476702509 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 419.366225166 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.4306403979 49.2860985944 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.25 110.228320801 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 21.698381199 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 7.06452816374 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.360287937953 0.272083759551 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129599513034 0.0996497079465 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0944366084589 0.0662205650399 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208609983752 0.162205337803 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0569623913453 0.0443174109184 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 63.6247240618 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.