Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge specific theories presented in the reading passage.
First, according to the author, the 52-hertz whale may be a hybrid, and that is why its song is unique. Nevertheless, the speakerargues that it is unlikely that the 52-hertz whale is a hybrid. Typically all hybrid whales follow the migration patterns of non-hybridwhales, which means they usually travel with normal whales. However, scientists, by studying the 52-hertz whale's song, havedetermined that it does not migrate with other whales, but has an unusual migration pattern and travels alone.
Second,while the author suggests that poor hearing or deafness has led to the uniqueness of the 52-hertz whale's song, thespeaker claims that a damaged sense of hearing cannot be a good explanation for one important feature of the song, its highpitch. This is because just like humans, the pitch of a whale's song depends on the physical structure of its throat, its vocalapparatus. To produce such a high-pitched song, the 52-hertz whale must have a special throat structure, which neverthelesscannot be caused by a damaged sense of hearing as typically there is no connection between hearing and throat structure.
Third, despite the author's statement that the fact that the 52-hertz whale might be the only known member of a rare speciesmakes its song seem unusual, the speaker contends that this theory does not hold water. Even if the species was rare, thewhales must have had parents who would have produced the same unusual song. However, the technology which has beenused for decades to detect whale sounds have not picked up such special sounds before, which rules out the possibility that the52-hertz whale comes from a rare species.
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific solutions proposed in the reading passage 85
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they challenge specific theories presented in the reading passage 3
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific solutions proposed in the reading passage 3
- summarize the points made in the lecture 3
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific solutions proposed in the reading passage 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 194, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Typically,
...ly that the 52-hertz whale is a hybrid. Typically all hybrid whales follow the migration ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 7, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , while
...ation pattern and travels alone. Second,while the author suggests that poor hearing o...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 20, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...d throat structure. Third, despite the authors statement that the fact that the 52-her...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1378.0 1373.03311258 100% => OK
No of words: 265.0 270.72406181 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90993070179 2.5805825403 113% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577358490566 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 405.9 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.6622852567 49.2860985944 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.8 110.228320801 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5 21.698381199 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 7.06452816374 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0355139841226 0.272083759551 13% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0171009448569 0.0996497079465 17% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.018895600896 0.0662205650399 29% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0261941345887 0.162205337803 16% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00175736242558 0.0443174109184 4% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.3589403974 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 63.6247240618 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.