Summarize the points made in the lecture. Being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage.
The reading and the lecture are both about different reasons that may be caused the Little Ice Age. The author of the passage believes that there are several possible reasons for this phenomena. The lecturer challenges this statement made by the author. He is of the opinion that none of these reasons have caused Ice Age.
First of all, the author suggests that before the Ice Age, the temperature of the Earth increased exceedingly. It is noted that this enhancement of the temperature has caused that glaciers melted, so these melted glaciers decreased the temperature of the oceans. This argument is challenged by the lecturer. He says that if this is the reason for the start of the Ice Age, just temperature of North America and Europe have to be enhanced. Furthermore, he argues that the temperature of the Southern hemisphere increased too.
Secondly, the writer contends that the Little Ice Age initiated since a large amount of volcanic eruption increased in that time. The article says that volcanic eruption emits dark cloud to the atmosphere which blocks sunlight. The lecturer, however, refutes this by asserting that if volcanic eruption had increased in that time, a large amount of dust produced which people would have noticed. He elaborates on this by asserting that there is no report of this phenomena.
Finally, it is stated in the article that the number of people decreased dramatically for various reasons before and during the Little Ice Age. The author establishes that forest trees started to grow more, then these trees absorbed carbon dioxide that caused that the Earth became cooler. The lecturer, on the other hand, posits that the decrease in the population of people took place in a short period of time. He puts forth the idea that forest did not have enough time to be the cause of decreasing the temperature of the world.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-29 | Opak Pulup | 3 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | NIMA SAEEDI | 3 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | NIMA SAEEDI | 3 | view |
| 2019-12-24 | NIMA SAEEDI | 80 | view |
| 2019-12-23 | NIMA SAEEDI | 80 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 68
- Summarize the points made in the lecture. Being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage. 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 71
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Life today is easier and more comfortable than it was when your grandparents were children.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- In modern times children learn more from their parent Others believe parents learn more from their children 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 180, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... there are several possible reasons for this phenomena. The lecturer challenges this...
^^^^
Line 1, column 196, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...al possible reasons for this phenomena. The lecturer challenges this statement made...
^^^
Line 3, column 458, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...by asserting that there is no report of this phenomena. Finally, it is stated in th...
^^^^
Line 4, column 398, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ulation of people took place in a short period of time. He puts forth the idea that forest did...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 22.0 12.0772626932 182% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 22.412803532 170% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1551.0 1373.03311258 113% => OK
No of words: 313.0 270.72406181 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9552715655 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5582377584 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 145.348785872 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.472843450479 0.540411800872 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 500.4 419.366225166 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.6788208787 49.2860985944 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.2352941176 110.228320801 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4117647059 21.698381199 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.23529411765 7.06452816374 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0317388845824 0.272083759551 12% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0136412361798 0.0996497079465 14% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0285756073543 0.0662205650399 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0233122087652 0.162205337803 14% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0261535921128 0.0443174109184 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.3589403974 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.