Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they oppose the specific points made in the reading passage.
The lecturer is in stark contrast to the claims made in the passage. She explains that professors going on television interview is not as beneficial as it may seem. The reasons she provides are discussed below.
On a first glance, it may seem that professors can gain reputation and importance among general people as a whole. But the lecturer points out that in reality it is harmful to the reputation of professor. The professor may be perceived as not a serious scholar by his/her contemporaries but as an entertainer. So, they may not invite him/her to an important meetings or discussions and university events. This does more harm to his reputation rather than benefit.
While the passage claims that having a professor appear in television does good to the reputation of university as well and aid in bringing more donations, the lecturer asserts little benefit may come out of it. The valuable time of professor is lost preparing for television interview. Going to interview consumes a lot of time in preparation like creating contents, rehearsing, travelling and makeup. This time could have been used in other productive activities like conducting research, meeting students. Thus, the lecturer states that going to interview will not necessarily be beneficial to the university.
Furthermore, televisions do not want an in depth academic content. What they crave for is only the title that attracts viewers. The lecturer provides examples on what the television broadcasters would ask the professor to do like they would ask the professor to provide brief background on recent important event or talk about a movie adaptation of a book. These are simple tasks that can be covered by a TV reporter with a little homework. So, she believes that it is not worthy to spend professors valuable time in such minor subject issues.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-24 | Royaaa | 3 | view |
| 2019-11-23 | Aylahh | 88 | view |
| 2019-08-22 | Bijay Shrestha | 3 | view |
| 2018-05-17 | goharzay.m | 3 | view |
| 2018-04-02 | Nerilene | 85 | view |
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the owner of Movies Galore, a chain of video rental stores.“In order to reverse the recent decline in our profits, we must reduce operating expenses at Movies Galore’s ten video rental stores. Since we are f 77
- Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted... 72
- The autonomy of any country is based on the strength of it’s borders; if the number of illegal immigrants entering a country cannot be checked, both it’s economy and national identity are endangered. Because illegal immigrants pose such threats, every 77
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they oppose the specific points made in the reading passage. 3
- An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be p 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: ON_FIRST_GLANCE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'at'?
Suggestion: At
...sons she provides are discussed below. On a first glance, it may seem that profes...
^^
Line 2, column 358, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'meeting'?
Suggestion: meeting
... may not invite him/her to an important meetings or discussions and university events. T...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, may, so, thus, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 30.3222958057 132% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1536.0 1373.03311258 112% => OK
No of words: 302.0 270.72406181 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08609271523 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92436413912 2.5805825403 113% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 145.348785872 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543046357616 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 419.366225166 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.4788548764 49.2860985944 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.3333333333 110.228320801 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7777777778 21.698381199 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.83333333333 7.06452816374 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 4.33554083885 231% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0783209074422 0.272083759551 29% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0284525268206 0.0996497079465 29% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0419666106054 0.0662205650399 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0550632452388 0.162205337803 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0363634053814 0.0443174109184 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.