Summarize the points made in the lecture you just heard, explaining how they cast doubt on the points made in the reading.
The reading and lecture are both about the two species which are quite identical to each other. Nevertheless, there are few prominent variances within them. The author of the reading states that bobobos are silent in nature however, the chimpanzeez are opposite to it. The lecturer disagrees. He mentions the features of both creatures are misinterpreted and attacks each of the claims made in the article.
The author of the reading begins by stating bobobos are peaceful and amicable in nature while chimpanzees are agressive and likely to injure each other. The lecturer believes there are flaws in the writer’s position. He contends although bonobos stick together, they throw object and are violent to each other. He also says chimpanzees are quiet as compared to bonobos.
According to writer bonobos interact so well however, chimpanzees are suceptible of murdering their own offspring. The speaker on other hand points out that since young bonobos are accompained by their parents, they are rarely killed. As for chimpanzees, they do not stay together so they are more volunerable to other chimpanzees.
Also the reading passage notes that bonobos are vegeterian and mostly eat fruits, leaves and nuts. On other hand, chimpanzees are non vegeterian therefore they hunt other animal for their survival which eventually is harmful to native species. The professor rebuts this argument. He puts forth the idea that beacause chimpanzees are short supply of food, they are compelled to hunt animals for their survival. If bobobos are limited to such environment, they end up killing others for food as well.
As we can see, the writer and speaker holds very conflicting views on these species. The lecturer effectively challenges the author’s argument.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-24 | prakriti malla | 80 | view |
| 2022-12-06 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 66 | view |
| 2022-10-13 | Nina Tsarevich | 3 | view |
| 2022-08-04 | alicegreen13 | 3 | view |
| 2019-08-29 | Ranzit Thapa | 3 | view |
- Technological progress has made the world a better place Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Use specific details and examples to support your answer 86
- Summarize the points made in the lecture and explain how the speaker casts doubt on specific points made in the reading passage 81
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Sometimes it is better to be dishonest Use specific reasons and details to support your answer 70
- Our current way of life will have a negative impact on future generation Do you agree or disagree Use specific answers or examples to support your answer 70
- Children should be required to help with household tasks as soon as they are able to do so Do you agree or disagree to the statement Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...more volunerable to other chimpanzees. Also the reading passage notes that bonobos ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 10.4613686534 201% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1485.0 1373.03311258 108% => OK
No of words: 281.0 270.72406181 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2846975089 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71712787811 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565836298932 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 419.366225166 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 3.25607064018 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.846893334 49.2860985944 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.1578947368 110.228320801 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.7894736842 21.698381199 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.78947368421 7.06452816374 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129272102182 0.272083759551 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0397651055029 0.0996497079465 40% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0317254560667 0.0662205650399 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0676022106073 0.162205337803 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.030100606173 0.0443174109184 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.3589403974 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.75 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 63.6247240618 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.