summerise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific point made in the reading passage.

Essay topics:

summerise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific point made in the reading passage.

In this set of materials, the reading section explains the ways that we can use in order to make birds avoid to collide windows of towers and the writer illustrates some solution to this problem, and, the listening section cast doubt on information presented in the passage, and, argues that all of the solutions are not useful because some problem which he introduces them in the listening section.
First, the passage points out that architectures can use one-way glass in buildings. However, the lecture makes the point that this solution is not suitable because one-way glass similar to mirror and reflects the image of outside on glass, therefore, birds collide with glass and they harm, for instance, this kind of glass reflects the image of trees on the glass.
Second, according to the text we can use painted glass for our building, the speaker disagrees with this point, and, asserts that using this kind of glass makes dark in the building and people open the window and another side of the glass operate similar to the mirror, therefore this solution is inutile too.
Third, the article claims that architectures can use the magnetic field in building so as to run away birds. on the contrary, the lecture point outs that birds use a magnetic sense to emigrate. although birds can sense the magnetic field of Earth, they don't use it for a short trip. therefore this theory is not convenient because they use it only for migration.
In conclusion, the talk bolster, the mentioned pieces of information in the passage.

Votes
Average: 7.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-11-04 salarmoheb 3 view
2019-11-04 salarmoheb 3 view
2019-10-08 salarmoheb 80 view
2018-12-15 salarmoheb 90 view
2018-12-03 salarmoheb 3 view
>>> More users practiced this topic >>>
Essay Categories
Integrated TOEFL Writing
Essays by user salarmoheb :
>>> more essays by the user >>>

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 104, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'avoid colliding'.
Suggestion: avoid colliding
... that we can use in order to make birds avoid to collide windows of towers and the writer illust...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 293, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...sented in the passage, and, argues that all of the solutions are not useful because some p...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 85, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
... can use the magnetic field in building so as to run away birds. on the contrary, the le...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 109, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: On
...ld in building so as to run away birds. on the contrary, the lecture point outs th...
^^
Line 4, column 194, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Although
...birds use a magnetic sense to emigrate. although birds can sense the magnetic field of E...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 253, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...sense the magnetic field of Earth, they dont use it for a short trip. therefore this...
^^^^
Line 4, column 283, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
...rth, they dont use it for a short trip. therefore this theory is not convenient because t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 283, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: therefore,
...rth, they dont use it for a short trip. therefore this theory is not convenient because t...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, second, so, therefore, third, as to, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1273.0 1373.03311258 93% => OK
No of words: 260.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89615384615 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47470935476 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 145.348785872 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507692307692 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 387.9 419.366225166 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 21.2450331126 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 117.897423505 49.2860985944 239% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 141.444444444 110.228320801 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.8888888889 21.698381199 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7777777778 7.06452816374 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0974584507862 0.272083759551 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0474280857565 0.0996497079465 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0247253733459 0.0662205650399 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0554462274456 0.162205337803 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0153340427067 0.0443174109184 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.3589403974 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 53.8541721854 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.0289183223 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.7273730684 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.498013245 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.