teamwork
The article and the lecture both deal with having a group of people working together as a team on projects. whilst the author thinks this is a good idea for three specific reasons. the lecturer opposes the author's claim. In his opinion, the arguments do not hold water.
first, the author claims that working in a group enhance more knowledge, better outcome, and solutions as the group share ideas and responses. furthermore, the author stated that creative ideas come out of group working cause they all have responsibility together no one to take the risk alone. in contrast, the lecturer argues that as there are free rides -as he called them- those people don't participate with the group and take the credit with them.
second, the author mentioned that the person who participates in the process is more noticeable, their voice in making decisions and taking the lead made them highly significant. On the other hand, the lecturer opposes that, he believes that recognition of the work goes to the whole group which is the opposite of what someone who works harder than others will want.
finally, the author stated that the person will be known more significantly and his abilities will shine brighter on teamwork, he asserts that results can be more far-reaching and have a greater impact through teamwork. as opposed to the author the lecturer holds that projects don't move well on teamwork as they need more meetings to set one opinion. he highlights that some are more influential than others. the influencers who have significant personalities their words go better than others even if their ideas don't work. this ends up sometimes, with wrong results. project failure goes to the whole group.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-13 | M. MEHRABI KERMANI | 3 | view |
| 2022-07-21 | alicegreen13 | 70 | view |
| 2022-05-17 | me_nony@hotmail.com | 7 | view |
| 2020-11-23 | Zebranah | 78 | view |
| 2020-08-04 | boularas | 3 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 109, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Whilst
...working together as a team on projects. whilst the author thinks this is a good idea f...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 182, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...a good idea for three specific reasons. the lecturer opposes the authors claim. In ...
^^^
Line 3, column 2, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: First
...n, the arguments do not hold water. first, the author claims that working in a gr...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 145, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Furthermore
...as the group share ideas and responses. furthermore, the author stated that creative ideas ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 297, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...together no one to take the risk alone. in contrast, the lecturer argues that as t...
^^
Line 3, column 392, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... rides -as he called them- those people dont participate with the group and take the...
^^^^
Line 5, column 2, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Second
...roup and take the credit with them. second, the author mentioned that the person w...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Finally
...works harder than others will want. finally, the author stated that the person will...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 221, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: As
...have a greater impact through teamwork. as opposed to the author the lecturer hold...
^^
Line 7, column 279, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...author the lecturer holds that projects dont move well on teamwork as they need more...
^^^^
Line 7, column 353, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
... need more meetings to set one opinion. he highlights that some are more influenti...
^^
Line 7, column 411, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
... some are more influential than others. the influencers who have significant person...
^^^
Line 7, column 516, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... better than others even if their ideas dont work. this ends up sometimes, with wron...
^^^^
Line 7, column 527, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...n others even if their ideas dont work. this ends up sometimes, with wrong results. ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 571, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Project
... ends up sometimes, with wrong results. project failure goes to the whole group.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, if, second, so, well, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1428.0 1373.03311258 104% => OK
No of words: 286.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99300699301 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53183554114 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576923076923 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 427.5 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.9734038638 49.2860985944 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.2 110.228320801 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0666666667 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 7.06452816374 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 15.0 4.19205298013 358% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0941905211533 0.272083759551 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0283095071801 0.0996497079465 28% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0730938768019 0.0662205650399 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.049857661378 0.162205337803 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0863560026533 0.0443174109184 195% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.3589403974 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.