Technology has made it easier for people to communicate with each other. Some people prefer to talk over the phone while others prefer to communicate through text messages. Which type of communication do you prefer and why?
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. Make sure to use your own words. Do not use memorized examples.
Communication in human lives is of paramount importance. Once cannot afford to be casual about it. Afterall a significant amount of human life thrives on the effectiveness of communication. However, the tools and modes of communication have evolved over the years. I am strong proponent of written communication, and I would explore more through the following pragraphs and justify my inclination.
To begin, I would always supplement my verbal communication with a written text thereby summarizing the discussion. This is extremely useful if my audience or the participants have a fragile memory and its hard for them to recollect the specifics of discussion. When you send a written text to your audience, you provide them with a tool to fall back if they happen to forget the conversation, which is quite normal amongst all age groups. Last week, when I met my project team and reviewed the open action items, I noticed how oblivious and ineffective my colleagues were. Owing to a personal emergency, I had to rush out of the office and I could not summarize the minutes of our meeting in an email. The absence of written text induced the situation where we had landed as a team. Most of us couldn't recollect our tasks and even if someone did, there was a cacophony as the team couldn't collectively agree on the actions.
Next, summarizing a phone call or an interchange with a written message promotes trust and professionalism in the social lives. When you take the extra mile by drafting the minutes of your meeting, you send a purposeful message to your audience. As a result, your audience feel the motivation to work on their actions and help your fulfil the objective of your meeting. Moreover, you leave a lasting impression that can reap its own benefits going forward. I was presenting the program to my executive team last week, wherein some of them had volleyed some action items for me. Throughout the meeting I scribbled my notes and followed up the presentation with a lucidly compiled minutes of meeting. As you would have guessed, I received a series of appreciations from the group and some encouragement to take up more responsibilities moving forward.
In a nutshell, if we can communicate more frequently through text messages, we can definitely be more productive in achieving our goals in life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-17 | doggedarnab | 73 | view |
- Technology has made it easier for people to communicate with each other Some people prefer to talk over the phone while others prefer to communicate through text messages Which type of communication do you prefer and why Use specific reasons and examples 73
- Technology has made it easier for people to communicate with each other Some people prefer to talk over the phone while others prefer to communicate through text messages Which type of communication do you prefer and why 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 58, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Once” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...human lives is of paramount importance. Once cannot afford to be casual about it. Af...
^^^^
Line 1, column 100, Rule ID: AFTERALL[1]
Message: Did you mean 'after all'?
Suggestion: After all
...ce cannot afford to be casual about it. Afterall a significant amount of human life thri...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... pragraphs and justify my inclination. To begin, I would always supplement my ...
^^^
Line 3, column 797, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...ere we had landed as a team. Most of us couldnt recollect our tasks and even if someone...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 884, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
... did, there was a cacophony as the team couldnt collectively agree on the actions. ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dnt collectively agree on the actions. Next, summarizing a phone call or an in...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... more responsibilities moving forward. In a nutshell, if we can communicate mo...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 7.30242825607 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 47.0 22.412803532 210% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 30.3222958057 162% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 5.01324503311 359% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1939.0 1373.03311258 141% => OK
No of words: 391.0 270.72406181 144% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95907928389 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44676510885 4.04702891845 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0603457024 2.5805825403 119% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 145.348785872 149% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554987212276 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 616.5 419.366225166 147% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 3.25607064018 369% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 8.23620309051 24% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 1.25165562914 479% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 13.0662251656 153% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.0210538899 49.2860985944 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.95 110.228320801 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.55 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.9 7.06452816374 27% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 4.33554083885 231% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140242702864 0.272083759551 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0419357535452 0.0996497079465 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0390013713901 0.0662205650399 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0849242516181 0.162205337803 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00577686765124 0.0443174109184 13% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 63.6247240618 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.