There has been discussion about the ethanol fuel, whether it is an alternative to gasoline in the United States. The lecturer argues that the usage of ethanol is going to be very good alternative. While the author contends that it is not a good replacement for gasoline.
The first area of dispute is that the increased use of ethanol fuel would not help to solve the global warming as the biggest environmental problem. According to the professor the increase of ethanol use is not effect the global warming because it is produce by plants which the growing process counteract the release of carbon dioxide. However, this directly refute the reading passage which states that ethanol releases carbon dioxide into atmosphere when it burned for
Another controversial point is that the production of high amount of ethanol would reduce the amount of plants that is available for other usages. The professor argues that they can use the cellulose that is a good component of the cell wall in the plant part. So, they do not need to reduce the amount of plants. Again, this contradicts what is stated in the reading which states that if they use the corn to produce ethanol, it will reduce the amount of corn for feeding farm animals.
The final argument is that the price of ethanol cannot compete with the gasoline. The professor explain that the price of ethanol will be decrease if they produce high amount. So the price is going to follow the market needs. However, the text ignores these potential explanations by saying that the price of gasoline and ethanol are the same and the tax subsidies given to ethanol producers by the United States government it is going to continue by helping
Summing up, the professor presents three arguments to counter the author's claim.
There has been discussion about the ethanol fuel, whether it is an alternative to gasoline in the United States. The lecturer argues that the usage of ethanol is going to be very good alternative. While the author contends that it is not a good replacement for gasoline.
The first area of dispute is that the increased use of ethanol fuel would not help to solve the global warming as the biggest environmental problem. According to the professor the increase of ethanol use is not effect the global warming because it is produce by plants which the growing process counteract the release of carbon dioxide. However, this directly refute the reading passage which states that ethanol releases carbon dioxide into atmosphere when it burned for
Another controversial point is that the production of high amount of ethanol would reduce the amount of plants that is available for other usages. The professor argues that they can use the cellulose that is a good component of the cell wall in the plant part. So, they do not need to reduce the amount of plants. Again, this contradicts what is stated in the reading which states that if they use the corn to produce ethanol, it will reduce the amount of corn for feeding farm animals.
The final argument is that the price of ethanol cannot compete with the gasoline. The professor explain that the price of ethanol will be decrease if they produce high amount. So the price is going to follow the market needs. However, the text ignores these potential explanations by saying that the price of gasoline and ethanol are the same and the tax subsidies given to ethanol producers by the United States government it is going to continue by helping
Summing up, the professor presents three arguments to counter the author's claim.
- The author states that many scientists believe that the condition on Venus are not hospitable to maintain a permanent human presence. As opposed to, the professor who counter-argues that viewpoint trying to prove that these three conditions do not seem co 73
- The author states the evidence of the cloud seeding which has been effective in protecting crops from hail. As opposed to, the lecturer who counter-argues that viewpoint trying to prove that these three evidence do not seem convincing.First and foremost, 71
- Should people learn the foreign language by going to the country that speaks the language? 60
- The author states about the thoughts that some archaeologists had about the vessels that were used as electric batteries in ancient times. as opposed to, the lecturer who counter-argues that viewpoint trying to prove that these thoughts do not seem convin 71
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 212, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[6]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
...ssor the increase of ethanol use is not effect the global warming because it is produc...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 472, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oxide into atmosphere when it burned for Another controversial point is that the ...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 97, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'explains'.
Suggestion: explains
...ompete with the gasoline. The professor explain that the price of ethanol will be decr...
^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 122, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... The professor explain that the price of ethanol will be decrease if they produce...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1487.0 1373.03311258 108% => OK
No of words: 303.0 270.72406181 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90759075908 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48054877858 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491749174917 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 468.0 419.366225166 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 81.3058365264 49.2860985944 165% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.384615385 110.228320801 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3076923077 21.698381199 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.23076923077 7.06452816374 32% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.368940161323 0.272083759551 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154293870342 0.0996497079465 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.178799681833 0.0662205650399 270% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.247374892478 0.162205337803 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.318205637799 0.0443174109184 718% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.