The reading passage proposes three reasons to explain how humpback whales conduct the migration behaviour. It said humpback whales are intelligent enough to navigate by observing the stars.While the lecturer completely disagrees with the statements given in the reading passage.
Firstly, the intelligence has no direct connection with the ability of migration. The lecturer illustrate his agrument by giving an example that birds migrate by using the stars in the night for orientation, but the intelligence of birds is only average not that intelligent. In this case, we can not find the connection between intelligence and the ablility of migration.
Secondly, there is surely internal driving force to motivate the action. The lecturer figures out it is the magnetic force of the earth rather than the observation to help humpback whales on their route when they migrate. They are very sensitive to this kind of force.
Lastly, not only humback whales exhibit the spy-hopping behavior, so do the sharks. Sharks do not mirgrate,they conduct spy-hopping when they are hunting and even in the night without stars. So this evidence provides that spy-hoppying has nothing to do with humpback whales' migration behavior.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is important to know about events happening around the world, even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
- Some young adults want independence from their parents as soon as possible. Other young adults prefer to live with their families for a longer time. Which of these situations do you think is better? 60
- TOEFL T P O 49 - Integrated Writing Task 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The extended family (grandparents, cousins, aunts, and uncles) is less important now than it was in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
- TPO 12 - Jane Austen Portrait 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 190, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: While
...ough to navigate by observing the stars.While the lecturer completely disagrees with ...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 190, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ough to navigate by observing the stars.While the lecturer completely disagrees with ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 97, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ate the action. The lecturer figures out it is the magnetic force of the earth ra...
^^
Line 4, column 106, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , they
...so do the sharks. Sharks do not mirgrate,they conduct spy-hopping when they are hunti...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, lastly, second, secondly, so, while, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.01324503311 259% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1030.0 1373.03311258 75% => OK
No of words: 191.0 270.72406181 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39267015707 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 4.04702891845 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87621888428 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 145.348785872 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.591623036649 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 318.6 419.366225166 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.1369275239 49.2860985944 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.6363636364 110.228320801 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3636363636 21.698381199 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.90909090909 7.06452816374 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 4.45695364238 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 53.8541721854 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.2367328918 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.