Toefl TPO 16
The passage and the lecture posit two opposite view on the science of archeology which is concerned to examine the archeological site and artifacts on Britain. While the passage states that archeological study and many archeological sites are affected due to lack proper regulations and human's constructional activities, the lecturer on the lecture counter that and says that new guidelines is already implemented in 1990 by the government and the situation is not like the passage described.
To begin with, the passage states that new construction building doesn't follow any rules when they construct a new building. And when they gigging for the foundation they found lots of archeological artifacts but they didn't care to preserve it. On the other hand, the lecturer refutes this point and says that new guidelines required every constructional site to be examined before by the expert archeologist and if they find any archeologically valuable sites they made a plan to protect and collect those artifacts. Therefore, no archeological artifact never get destroyed.
Nest, the passage has another view that financial support for the archeological research is not sufficient and it is mostly funded by government fund which is not adequate. In contrary, the lecturer states that new regulations allow the construction company to pay the fund for excavating an archeological site within the construction area. And for this regulations researcher are not hindered by the lack of financial resource they needed.
And finally, lack of job opportunity is another big reason that many students don't interested to pursue his career as an archeologist. Whereas, the lecturer says that new regulations open new job opportunities because now there is no obstacle to excavate an archeological site because of the new regulations. And for this, new job opportunities are created like an expert archeologist who needs to research, documentation and article writer for the new archeological findings and so on.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-09 | zhrnrz-1992 | 80 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 66, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...e states that new construction building doesnt follow any rules when they construct a ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 219, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...ots of archeological artifacts but they didnt care to preserve it. On the other hand,...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 355, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'regulations'' or 'regulation's'?
Suggestion: regulations'; regulation's
...hin the construction area. And for this regulations researcher are not hindered by the lack...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 79, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...s another big reason that many students dont interested to pursue his career as an a...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, so, therefore, whereas, while, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 7.30242825607 233% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1695.0 1373.03311258 123% => OK
No of words: 314.0 270.72406181 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39808917197 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20942798786 2.5805825403 124% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506369426752 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 535.5 419.366225166 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.9523999281 49.2860985944 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.25 110.228320801 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1666666667 21.698381199 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 7.06452816374 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199811239893 0.272083759551 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0880608055651 0.0996497079465 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0308126611481 0.0662205650399 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132523784128 0.162205337803 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0335535945353 0.0443174109184 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.3589403974 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 53.8541721854 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.0289183223 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.2367328918 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.7273730684 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.