TOEFL TPO 20 - Integrated Writing Task
Actually, both the passage and the lecture comment about a massive forest fire which occurred in the summer of 1988 in Yellowstone. Some policymakers suggest "let it burn" theory instead of extinguishing the fire flames as a solution in such a situation. Although the passage brings three hypothesizes to prove the fact that the mentioned suggestion is counted as an adverse method, the lecturer puts those under question. According to the statements that are expressed, none of the theories are convincing.
First, as the passage claimed, if the fires are allowed to continue, both trees and other vegetarians such as herbs and crops will be destroyed; in fact, the flames would cause deleterious ruin. The speaker; however, refutes the claim by exemplifying new trees and seed which have grown after the Yellowstone fire. She believes not only don't such phenomena incinerate the environment but they also contribute other new plants to grow.
Next, as the passage stated, animals habitat, as well as vegetation, were limited in Yellowstone forest. huge animals including deer and elk abandoned their dwelling; moreover, smaller animals which can't abdicate the land were killed by fire; nevertheless, the passage dismisses the though by adding the same reasons which have been illustrated for trees.
Finally, the article declares that the tourism industry will be encounter inevitable issues; indeed, they will lose their revenue. On the contrary, the lecturer claims that there are many tourists who have visited the Yellowstone after the massive fire forest; therefore, it isn't a controversial problem.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 338, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...Yellowstone fire. She believes not only dont such phenomena incinerate the environme...
^^^^
Line 9, column 106, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Huge
...on, were limited in Yellowstone forest. huge animals including deer and elk abandone...
^^^^
Line 9, column 200, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...elling; moreover, smaller animals which cant abdicate the land were killed by fire; ...
^^^^
Line 13, column 276, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
... the massive fire forest; therefore, it isnt a controversial problem.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, first, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, in fact, such as, as well as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 22.412803532 54% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 30.3222958057 66% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1380.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 252.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47619047619 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81345568293 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 145.348785872 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.646825396825 0.540411800872 120% => OK
syllable_count: 423.9 419.366225166 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.25165562914 399% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.754057021 49.2860985944 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.454545455 110.228320801 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9090909091 21.698381199 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.7272727273 7.06452816374 180% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237180170062 0.272083759551 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0823456731402 0.0996497079465 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0574492945459 0.0662205650399 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132446322412 0.162205337803 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0421413356315 0.0443174109184 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.3589403974 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.8541721854 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.0289183223 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 12.2367328918 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.8 8.42419426049 116% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 63.6247240618 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.