TOP 25
The reading passage was about obtaining of clay jars with battery characteristic purposes, however, there are several insufficient point to refut the battery utilities. In contrast, the lecturer cast doubt on the reading information and tried to gave other explanation for observation.
firstly, the reading passage mantioned, batteries need wire conductor such as metal wires and there is no wire found on the excavation location, however, the professor mentioned, the objects found by local people who not professonal in archeology, as a result, the wire overlooked.
Secondly, the reading part mentioned jars may releted for other utility, due to the fact that this jars similar to those holding scrolls, conversly, the lecturer refuts this argument and said this jars could adopt after several years to use as battery because, ancient people know by iron and specfic kind of liquid they than derive electricity.
Finally, reading passge suggested that there is no possible use for electricity for ancient people, in contrast, professor mentioned the electricity could use for healing of pain for relaxing muscles or convincing of other people in order to they have magic power.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Firstly
...ave other explanation for observation. firstly, the reading passage mantioned, batteri...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, however, look, may, second, secondly, so, in contrast, kind of, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 12.0772626932 25% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 22.412803532 36% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1000.0 1373.03311258 73% => OK
No of words: 185.0 270.72406181 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40540540541 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 4.04702891845 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77757902057 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 145.348785872 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.616216216216 0.540411800872 114% => OK
syllable_count: 314.1 419.366225166 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 13.0662251656 38% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 37.0 21.2450331126 174% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 82.1057854234 49.2860985944 167% => OK
Chars per sentence: 200.0 110.228320801 181% => OK
Words per sentence: 37.0 21.698381199 171% => OK
Discourse Markers: 21.8 7.06452816374 309% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.6 13.3589403974 169% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.46 53.8541721854 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.9 11.0289183223 171% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.69 12.2367328918 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.91 8.42419426049 118% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 10.7273730684 144% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.8 10.498013245 160% => OK
text_standard: 23.0 11.2008830022 205% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.