Based on the reading material, the author stated that there are 3 viable reasons that shows the Venus' surface is not a hospitable place for a permanent human presence. However, the professor finds this idea bereft of sufficient reasoning and cites some ides to the contrary.
Initially, the author argued that the atmospheric pressure at Venus is more greater than the pressure at Earth, so anything humans might land on Venus would be crushed. However, the lecturer refuted this idea by stating that humans can establish flooding stations on Venus, like the Balloons. In this way, the atmoshpheric pressure would be divided equally, so that it make a better setting for permanent human presence.
Another reason stated by the writer of the reading passage was that the absence of water on Venus' surface made it impossible for human to live there and it would be necessary for them to bring water and oxygen from Earth, which would be impractical in long term. That being said, the professor repudiated this one to by clarifying that on the Venus' surface, there are a considerable number of carbon dioxide and sulfuric acid compounds, which have water and humans can reach to water through these compounds. Thus, there is no need for humans to supply their water from Earth.
The final point mentioned in the reading section was that very little sunlight reaches the planet's surface, so humans couldn't get electricity to power their machines and equipments. Yet again, the lecturer criticized this idea. He said that the clouds at Venus are not very thick, so the light would be reached to the planet's surface. Also, the sunlight would be reflected at Venus and humans can use the sunlight either directly or indirectly in order to get electricity to power their machines and equipments.
- TPO-30 - Integrated Writing Task A little over 2,200 years ago, the Roman navy attacked the Greek port city of Syracuse. According to some ancient historians, the Greeks defended themselves with an ingenious weapon called a "burning mirror": a polished co 86
- TPO-34 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone, online games, and social networking Web site.U 61
- TPO-48 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Because modern life is very complex, it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize. 73
- TPO-48 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Because modern life is very complex, it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize. 73
- TPO 39 - Independent taskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 72, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'greater' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: greater
...at the atmospheric pressure at Venus is more greater than the pressure at Earth, so anything...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 119, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
... reaches the planets surface, so humans couldnt get electricity to power their machines...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1493.0 1373.03311258 109% => OK
No of words: 300.0 270.72406181 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97666666667 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49816599395 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 145.348785872 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513333333333 0.540411800872 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 462.6 419.366225166 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.4514811674 49.2860985944 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.416666667 110.228320801 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 21.698381199 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.25 7.06452816374 32% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0965597158576 0.272083759551 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0408289791434 0.0996497079465 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0461196025035 0.0662205650399 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0645718925129 0.162205337803 40% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0268355941662 0.0443174109184 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.