top40: Establishing new station on Venus' surface challenges and profits.
In this set of materials, the reading passage discusses three challenges in establishing permanent station on venous. However, the professors, resolve the problems by floating station, and provide evidence to support the idea.
First of all, the author of the passage claims that pressure at Venus is considerably high, besides, space craft of human might crush while landing on surface. In contrast, the lecturer refutes this point and says that by floating station 50 kilometers above the surface the pressure is lower, as a result, human have no challenge. Hence, the atmospheric pressure could not damage human.
Secondly, the article holds the view that Venus' surface do not have water resources, so water should transport to Venus. The professor, however, opposes this view and states that Venus's surface contain compounds which could make water under some chemical reactions. Therefore, there is no need to transport water to Venus.
Finally, the reading suggested that Venus have thick cloud which prevent enough sun light reach to the surface. Therefore, solar cells could not work properly to produce electricity. Conversely, the professor mentions the floating station at higher distance could reach a considerable amount of solar energy, besides, the reflection of light in below clouds could capture and rise the electricity which needed for the station. As a result, it could possible to establish permanent stations on Venous.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-03-16 | alirezakasaie | 80 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, conversely, finally, first, hence, however, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, in contrast, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.4613686534 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 22.412803532 40% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1228.0 1373.03311258 89% => OK
No of words: 225.0 270.72406181 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45777777778 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64137637148 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.591111111111 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 369.0 419.366225166 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.501521142 49.2860985944 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.333333333 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.75 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9166666667 7.06452816374 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194434780391 0.272083759551 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0713883800743 0.0996497079465 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0517830842005 0.0662205650399 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114761551435 0.162205337803 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0310181832295 0.0443174109184 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.2367328918 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 63.6247240618 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.