The reading and lecture are both about the decline of Torreya population in the state of Florida. The author of the reading talks about three ways to solve this crisis. These claims are challenged by the lecturer. She is of the opinion that the author provides no satisfactory solutions.
To begin with, the author argues that they can reestablish Torreya in the same location in which it burgeoned for thousands of years. The article mentions that Northern Florida's microclimate is very favorable to Torreya 's growth. This specific argument is challenged by the lecturer. She notes that the climate is changing because of global warming and other causes. Additionally, she says that Torreya population would face dry climate, and could not have suitable condition to thrive.
Secondly, the author suggests that they can solve the problem by moving Torreya to an entirely different location, far from its Florida climate. In the article, it is stated that Torreya probably thrived in areas much further north in the distant past, so by relocating it in a assisted migration, humans would simply help Torreya to survive. The lecturer, however, rebuts this claims by mentioning that the black-locust trees. She elaborates on this by bringing up the point that they spread too quickly to different location , so they are in danger of becoming extinct. As a result, this method is not good to prevent Torreya extinction.
Finally, the author posits that preserving Torreya in research centers would be good method. Moreover, it is stated that seeds and saplings can be moved from the wild and preserved in a closely monitored environment. In contrast, the professor notes that Torreya could not be able to resist diseases. Additionally, she says that research centers do not have enough capacity to diverse species of Torreya.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Playing computer games is a waste of time Children should not be allowed to play them Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 55
- TPO-52. Integrated Writing Task. Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge the specific points made in the reading passage. 3
- TPO 36- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?For the successful development of a country, it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children(five to ten years old) than to spend money on universit 76
- It is important to know about events happening around the world, even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life. 76
- It has recently been announced that a new restaurant may be built in your neighborhood. Do you support or oppose this plan? Why? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 277, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...he distant past, so by relocating it in a assisted migration, humans would simply...
^
Line 5, column 527, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...spread too quickly to different location , so they are in danger of becoming exti...
^^
Line 5, column 529, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...read too quickly to different location , so they are in danger of becoming extinc...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, in contrast, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 22.412803532 147% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 30.3222958057 142% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1536.0 1373.03311258 112% => OK
No of words: 297.0 270.72406181 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17171717172 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69884623521 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 145.348785872 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548821548822 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 419.366225166 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 3.25607064018 307% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.7412121012 49.2860985944 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.3333333333 110.228320801 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5 21.698381199 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 7.06452816374 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150928635092 0.272083759551 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0482221886143 0.0996497079465 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0498322711236 0.0662205650399 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.093887224693 0.162205337803 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00466484797247 0.0443174109184 11% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.3589403974 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 63.6247240618 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.